RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Re: Next steps

[Claudio Di Gangi <cdigangi@xxxxxxxx>]

Chuck,

Agreed. From a chronological standpoint, I believe we reviewed the 
recertifications before the SG charters were approved.

We should either receive these documents from staff now or amend the language I 
copied below to make it clear we only reviewed the non-contracted party 
recertifications.

Claudio

________________________________
From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 1:39 PM
To: Victoria McEvedy; Claudio Di Gangi; Michael Young; Olga Cavalli; 
owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team
Cc: Julie Hedlund; Gisella Gruber-White; Glen de Saint Géry; Robert Hoggarth
Subject: [Junk released by Allow List] RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Re: Next steps

With the approval of the contracted party SG charters, there are no longer any 
recertifications of constituencies, but you could still look at the 
communications that happened to get to that point if you think that is useful, 
assuming that Staff can provide the info you are looking for.

Chuck

________________________________
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Victoria McEvedy
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 12:19 PM
To: Claudio Di Gangi; Michael Young; Olga Cavalli; 
owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team
Cc: Julie Hedlund; Gisella Gruber-White; Glen de Saint Géry; Robert Hoggarth
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Re: Next steps
No Claudio, I don't have the contracted parties' documents either.

Regards,

Victoria McEvedy
Principal
McEvedys
Solicitors and Attorneys
[cid:image001.jpg@01CA2B0B.A65651F0]

96 Westbourne Park Road
London
W2 5PL

T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122
F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721
M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169

www.mcevedy.eu
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the exclusive 
use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may also be legally 
privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us know by reply 
immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without reading, copying 
or forwarding the contents.
This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no retainer is 
created by this email communication.

From: Claudio Di Gangi [mailto:cdigangi@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: 01 September 2009 16:57
To: 'Michael Young'; Victoria McEvedy; 'Olga Cavalli'; 
owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx; 'OSC-CSG Work Team'
Cc: 'Julie Hedlund'; 'Gisella Gruber-White'; 'Glen de Saint Géry'; 'Robert 
Hoggarth'
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Re: Next steps

Victoria,

The draft document you wrote, states under "Staff Review":

"The Staff reviewed each Constituency Charter and Recertification application 
and made comments and suggestions to each Constituency. We also considered the 
Staff comments [and responses from Constituencies] [create master schedule and 
refer]."

I do not recall ever seeing the staff comments on the Registry or Registrar 
constituency recertification documents. The last email I have from Rob on this 
(attached) has the staff comments on the non-contracting party recertification 
documents.

Do you have a copy of the staff comments on contracting-party recertification 
documents?

Rob, if you have not sent these over to our list yet, can you please do so?

Thanks

Claudio

________________________________
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Michael Young
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 10:59 AM
To: victoria@xxxxxxxxxx; 'Olga Cavalli'; owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx; 'OSC-CSG 
Work Team'
Cc: 'Julie Hedlund'; 'Gisella Gruber-White'; 'Glen de Saint Géry'; 'Robert 
Hoggarth'
Subject: [Junk released by Allow List] RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Re: Next steps

Victoria please find my comments.  In general this represents a great deal of 
effort and I'd like to recognize that.

Thank you for the contribution.

Best Regards,

Michael Young

Vice-President,
Product Development
Afilias
O: +14166734109
C: +16472891220

From: victoria@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:victoria@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: August-31-09 6:05 AM
To: Olga Cavalli; owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx; OSC-CSG Work Team
Cc: Julie Hedlund; Gisella Gruber-White; Glen de Saint Géry; Robert Hoggarth
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Re: Next steps

Olga - I was proposing to write up and summarise comments on subtask 1.2 
--rather than include them verbatim. Both your comments and those of other 
subtask members and any others. I'd like to reserve the final decision on that 
until the final comments come in tomorrow. I think we also need to consider our 
timeframes again following Robert's point ---and work in time for us to try to 
reach a consensus ---as its this group that must try to do so ---not our 
steering committee. Victoria

Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device

________________________________
From: Olga Cavalli
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 23:29:11 -0300
To: OSC-CSG Work Team<gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Re: Next steps
Hi,
some comments:

1. I have finished reviewing the document prepared by VIctoria, which is very 
complete and includes several recommendations.

Claudio has already comment, also mysefl. The document with our comments is 
attached to this email, please remember we have a due date for this revision 
which is next Tuesday 1st September.

2. SS will send his documents in parts, Krista will send her documents soon.

3. Julie will include Claudio´s recommendations in her document.

We will try to have all draft document of subtasks by Friday 4 september and 
organize our work during our conference call that day.

Please let me know if any of you need help.

Regards to all and have a good week.

Olga
2009/8/28 Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Dear Work Team members,

First let me commend all of you for all the work done so far.

We have made a great progress and we still have some more work to do in order 
to reach our gol in finishing a recommendations draft document by the end of 
next week.

In this sense let me summarize what was discussed in our conference call today:

1. WT should look and comment SS document.
SS will add background and additional information and will circulate new 
version of the document.

2. A due date for sending comments to Victoria´s document is set for next 
Tuesday, members of subworking team are welcome to comment and the rest of the 
wt also can comment.

3. Krista and Tony will send to the list their draft recommendations document, 
Victoria will join them in doing this task.
WT should review and comment the document once sent to the list.

4. Julie: is it possible to consider / include Claudio´s suggestions to your 
draft document about subtask 4?

5. Formatting of the final draft recommendations document: my suggestion is to 
use the same format that Julie and Chuck use in theirs: references, 
introduction, background, recommendations and add a general conclusion. I 
volunteer for preparing the general draft once we have the different parts 
ready.

6. Timing: we should define the due date for sending our draft document to the 
OSC.
Chuck, could you please help us defining this date? Considering that the 
document must be approved by the OSC and by the GNSO council and next 
conference call of GNSO are Sept 3 and Sept 24.

Remember that we have our next conference call next Friday 1300 GMT.

Have a nice weekend and thanks again for your active participation and hard 
work.

Best
Olga


--
Olga Cavalli, Dr. Ing.
www.south-ssig.com.ar<http://www.south-ssig.com.ar>



--
Olga Cavalli, Dr. Ing.
www.south-ssig.com.ar<http://www.south-ssig.com.ar>


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4386 (20090901) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4386 (20090901) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com