<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Re: Next steps
- To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Re: Next steps
- From: Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 19:50:45 -0300
Chuck,
you are right, the due date is for the subtask team.
Apologies for the confusing message.
Regards
Olga
2009/9/1 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> My understanding is that the subtask team had that due date. If I am
> incorrect on that, please let me know.
>
> Chuck
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Olga Cavalli
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 01, 2009 3:33 PM
> *To:* OSC-CSG Work Team
> *Cc:* Julie Hedlund; Gisella Gruber-White; Glen de Saint Géry; Robert
> Hoggarth
> *Subject:* [gnso-osc-csg] Re: Next steps
>
> Dear Work Team members,
>
> Please remember that we have a due date today for commenting on Victoria´s
> document.
>
> We are also expecting other pieces of information from other subworking
> teams.
>
> Thanks for all those who have contributed with documents, comments and
> exchange of ideas.
>
> We are making good progress.
>
> Remember also that we will have a conference call next Friday 4 September
> 13:00 GMT and hopefuly we will have the basic documents to prepare our
> recommendations.
>
> Best regards
> Olga
>
>
> 2009/8/28 Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>> Dear Work Team members,
>>
>> First let me commend all of you for all the work done so far.
>>
>> We have made a great progress and we still have some more work to do in
>> order to reach our gol in finishing a recommendations draft document by the
>> end of next week.
>>
>> In this sense let me summarize what was discussed in our conference call
>> today:
>>
>> 1. WT should look and comment SS document.
>> SS will add background and additional information and will circulate new
>> version of the document.
>>
>> 2. A due date for sending comments to Victoria´s document is set for next
>> Tuesday, members of subworking team are welcome to comment and the rest of
>> the wt also can comment.
>>
>> 3. Krista and Tony will send to the list their draft recommendations
>> document, Victoria will join them in doing this task.
>> WT should review and comment the document once sent to the list.
>>
>> 4. Julie: is it possible to consider / include Claudio´s suggestions to
>> your draft document about subtask 4?
>>
>> 5. Formatting of the final draft recommendations document: my suggestion
>> is to use the same format that Julie and Chuck use in theirs: references,
>> introduction, background, recommendations and add a general conclusion. I
>> volunteer for preparing the general draft once we have the different parts
>> ready.
>>
>> 6. Timing: we should define the due date for sending our draft document to
>> the OSC.
>> Chuck, could you please help us defining this date? Considering that the
>> document must be approved by the OSC and by the GNSO council and next
>> conference call of GNSO are Sept 3 and Sept 24.
>>
>> Remember that we have our next conference call next Friday 1300 GMT.
>>
>> Have a nice weekend and thanks again for your active participation and
>> hard work.
>>
>> Best
>> Olga
>>
>>
>> --
>> Olga Cavalli, Dr. Ing.
>> www.south-ssig.com.ar
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Olga Cavalli, Dr. Ing.
> www.south-ssig.com.ar
>
>
--
Olga Cavalli, Dr. Ing.
www.south-ssig.com.ar
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|