<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask 4: Draft Tool Kit Recommendations
- To: "Victoria McEvedy" <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Julie Hedlund" <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-osc-csg" <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask 4: Draft Tool Kit Recommendations
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:17:53 -0400
What do you disagree with Victoria? I made two statements. Which one is
wrong and why?
Chuck
________________________________
From: Victoria McEvedy [mailto:victoria@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 2:45 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Julie Hedlund; gnso-osc-csg
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask 4:
Draft Tool Kit Recommendations
I disagree Chuck.
It was clearly called as a failure to reach rough consensus.
My understanding is that happens in a meeting -and is not a
process that goes out to a group unless by formal vote.
Please point to the procedure you cite so we can see the actual
language and let's wait for the recording and see where we are then.
I would also like to review our earlier discussion on splitting
the work in the earlier meetings.
Best,
Victoria McEvedy
Principal
McEvedys
Solicitors and Attorneys
96 Westbourne Park Road
London
W2 5PL
T: +44 (0) 207 243 6122
F: +44 (0) 207 022 1721
M: +44 (0) 7990 625 169
www.mcevedy.eu
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for
the exclusive use of the addressee(s). This email and its attachments
may also be legally privileged. If you have received this in error,
please let us know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its
attachments without reading, copying or forwarding the contents.
This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and
no retainer is created by this email communication.
From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 25 September 2009 19:40
To: Victoria McEvedy; Julie Hedlund; gnso-osc-csg
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask 4:
Draft Tool Kit Recommendations
We did not reach unanimous consensus. It remains to be seen
whether there is rough consensus.
Chuck
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Victoria McEvedy
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 1:11 PM
To: Julie Hedlund; gnso-osc-csg
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask
4: Draft Tool Kit Recommendations
Thanks Julie I will be reverting with comments on
Monday.
We already dealt with (3) on the call and failed to
reach a rough consensus as I understood it?
Best,
Victoria McEvedy
Principal
McEvedys
Solicitors and Attorneys
96 Westbourne Park Road
London
W2 5PL
T: +44 (0) 207 243 6122
F: +44 (0) 207 022 1721
M: +44 (0) 7990 625 169
www.mcevedy.eu
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
This email and its attachments are confidential and
intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). This email and its
attachments may also be legally privileged. If you have received this in
error, please let us know by reply immediately and destroy the email and
its attachments without reading, copying or forwarding the contents.
This email does not create a solicitor-client
relationship and no retainer is created by this email communication.
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: 25 September 2009 16:36
To: gnso-osc-csg
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask 4:
Draft Tool Kit Recommendations
Dear Work Team members,
On today's call we discussed the final draft of the Tool
Kit Services Recommendations for GNSO Organizations (Draft 3 11 Sept
09), which incorporates changes suggested by Claudio. On the call we
decided to circulate this final draft to allow time for those who have
not already done so to comment on the document. The Work Team is asking
for a response from you, no later than Tuesday, 29 September, on the
following:
1. Any suggested changes to Draft 3 of the Tool Kit
Services Recommendations
2. If no suggested changes, please affirm that you
agree with the final draft version of the Recommendations
3. Please indicate whether these Recommendations
should be provided a) to the OSC as soon as they are agreed to by the
Work Team; b) along with Recommendations for the other Subtasks; or c)
please let us know if you have suggestions for another way to handle
these Recommendations.
Also, those of you who were at the meeting please feel
free to add comments or clarifications to my summary of this action item
from our meeting. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Julie
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus,
version of virus signature database 4457 (20090925) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus,
version of virus signature database 4458 (20090925) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of
virus signature database 4458 (20090925) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of
virus signature database 4458 (20090925) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|