RE: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask 4: Draft Tool Kit Recommendations

["Victoria McEvedy" <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Let me clarify that Chuck -you have referred to our Charter. My point is
this ---it is not acceptable for newcomers to Icann to have to rely on
statements like "The GNSO working group model that has evolved over the
last 4 years has " -those rules should be certain and predictable and
available and accessible to all -and that is what we are working on with
Constituencies and interested parties. While the GNSO working group
model is being worked on and this is underway -can you appreciate that
it is unfair to subject newcomers to this sort of thing -whereby the old
hands -who are not disinterested can advise on the rules as they go
along and arguably make them to suit? It also favours the institutional
players. It's this sort of basic issue some of us have been trying to
deal with in this WG. Sorry but this is a prime example.   

 

Victoria McEvedy

Principal 

McEvedys

Solicitors and Attorneys 

cid:669FC637-760A-4D2F-B56E-2C180C1870CC

 

96 Westbourne Park Road 

London 

W2 5PL

 

T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122

F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721

M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169 

 

www.mcevedy.eu  

Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972

This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the
exclusive use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may
also be legally privileged. If you have received this in error, please
let us know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its
attachments without reading, copying or forwarding the contents.

This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no
retainer is created by this email communication. 

 

From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 25 September 2009 20:18
To: Victoria McEvedy; Julie Hedlund; gnso-osc-csg
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask 4: Draft Tool
Kit Recommendations

 

What do you disagree with Victoria?  I made two statements. Which one is
wrong and why?

 

Chuck

 

  _____  

From: Victoria McEvedy [mailto:victoria@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 2:45 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Julie Hedlund; gnso-osc-csg
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask 4: Draft Tool
Kit Recommendations

I disagree Chuck. 

 

It was clearly called as a failure to reach rough consensus. 

 

My understanding is that happens in a meeting -and is not a process that
goes out to a group unless by formal vote. 

 

Please point to the procedure you cite so we can see the actual language
and let's wait for the recording and see where we are then.

 

I would also like to review our earlier discussion on splitting the work
in the earlier meetings. 

 

Best, 

 

 

 

Victoria McEvedy

Principal 

McEvedys

Solicitors and Attorneys 

cid:669FC637-760A-4D2F-B56E-2C180C1870CC

 

96 Westbourne Park Road 

London 

W2 5PL

 

T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122

F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721

M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169 

 

www.mcevedy.eu  

Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972

This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the
exclusive use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may
also be legally privileged. If you have received this in error, please
let us know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its
attachments without reading, copying or forwarding the contents.

This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no
retainer is created by this email communication. 

 

From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 25 September 2009 19:40
To: Victoria McEvedy; Julie Hedlund; gnso-osc-csg
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask 4: Draft Tool
Kit Recommendations

 

We did not reach unanimous consensus. It remains to be seen whether
there is rough consensus.

 

Chuck

 

  _____  

From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Victoria McEvedy
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 1:11 PM
To: Julie Hedlund; gnso-osc-csg
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask 4: Draft Tool
Kit Recommendations

Thanks Julie I will be reverting with comments on Monday. 

 

We already dealt with (3) on the call and failed to reach a rough
consensus as I understood it? 

 

Best,   

 

 

Victoria McEvedy

Principal 

McEvedys

Solicitors and Attorneys 

cid:669FC637-760A-4D2F-B56E-2C180C1870CC

 

96 Westbourne Park Road 

London 

W2 5PL

 

T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122

F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721

M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169 

 

www.mcevedy.eu  

Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972

This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the
exclusive use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may
also be legally privileged. If you have received this in error, please
let us know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its
attachments without reading, copying or forwarding the contents.

This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no
retainer is created by this email communication. 

 

From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: 25 September 2009 16:36
To: gnso-osc-csg
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask 4: Draft Tool Kit
Recommendations

 

Dear Work Team members,

On today's call we discussed the final draft of the Tool Kit Services
Recommendations for GNSO Organizations (Draft 3 11 Sept 09), which
incorporates changes suggested by Claudio.  On the call we decided to
circulate this final draft to allow time for those who have not already
done so to comment on the document.  The Work Team is asking for a
response from you, no later than Tuesday, 29 September, on the
following:

1.      Any suggested changes to Draft 3 of the Tool Kit Services
Recommendations 
2.      If no suggested changes, please affirm that you agree with the
final draft version of the Recommendations 
3.      Please indicate whether these Recommendations should be provided
a) to the OSC as soon as they are agreed to by the Work Team; b) along
with Recommendations for the other Subtasks; or c) please let us know if
you have suggestions for another way to handle these Recommendations. 


Also, those of you who were at the meeting please feel free to add
comments or clarifications to my summary of this action item from our
meeting. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you very much.

Best regards,

Julie 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 4457 (20090925) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 4458 (20090925) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 4458 (20090925) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 4458 (20090925) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 4458 (20090925) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com