<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask 4: Draft Tool Kit Recommendations
- To: "Victoria McEvedy" <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Julie Hedlund" <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-osc-csg" <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask 4: Draft Tool Kit Recommendations
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:04:04 -0400
Victoria,
If that is unacceptable, then should we stop all work until the new
model is completely developed and approved by the Board sometime next
year? That is not a viable option in my opinion. Over the last four
years dozens of working groups, committees, teams, etc. have accepted
this evolving approach and our charter endorses. You are the first
person out of hundreds of people who has not. Are suggesting that all
the rest should acquiese to your concerns. I must be totally missing
something here.
You had access to our charter from the beginning of our work. Nothing
in it should be new to you.
In my opinion, it is a real shame that we have to spend so much time on
an issue like this instead of on the real work we have to do. I for one
am way to busy to do that so it becomes extremely frustrating.
Chuck
________________________________
From: Victoria McEvedy [mailto:victoria@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 3:45 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Julie Hedlund; gnso-osc-csg
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask 4:
Draft Tool Kit Recommendations
Let me clarify that Chuck -you have referred to our Charter. My
point is this ---it is not acceptable for newcomers to Icann to have to
rely on statements like "The GNSO working group model that has evolved
over the last 4 years has " -those rules should be certain and
predictable and available and accessible to all -and that is what we are
working on with Constituencies and interested parties. While the GNSO
working group model is being worked on and this is underway -can you
appreciate that it is unfair to subject newcomers to this sort of thing
-whereby the old hands -who are not disinterested can advise on the
rules as they go along and arguably make them to suit? It also favours
the institutional players. It's this sort of basic issue some of us have
been trying to deal with in this WG. Sorry but this is a prime example.
Victoria McEvedy
Principal
McEvedys
Solicitors and Attorneys
96 Westbourne Park Road
London
W2 5PL
T: +44 (0) 207 243 6122
F: +44 (0) 207 022 1721
M: +44 (0) 7990 625 169
www.mcevedy.eu
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for
the exclusive use of the addressee(s). This email and its attachments
may also be legally privileged. If you have received this in error,
please let us know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its
attachments without reading, copying or forwarding the contents.
This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and
no retainer is created by this email communication.
From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 25 September 2009 20:18
To: Victoria McEvedy; Julie Hedlund; gnso-osc-csg
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask 4:
Draft Tool Kit Recommendations
What do you disagree with Victoria? I made two statements.
Which one is wrong and why?
Chuck
________________________________
From: Victoria McEvedy [mailto:victoria@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 2:45 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Julie Hedlund; gnso-osc-csg
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask
4: Draft Tool Kit Recommendations
I disagree Chuck.
It was clearly called as a failure to reach rough
consensus.
My understanding is that happens in a meeting -and is
not a process that goes out to a group unless by formal vote.
Please point to the procedure you cite so we can see the
actual language and let's wait for the recording and see where we are
then.
I would also like to review our earlier discussion on
splitting the work in the earlier meetings.
Best,
Victoria McEvedy
Principal
McEvedys
Solicitors and Attorneys
96 Westbourne Park Road
London
W2 5PL
T: +44 (0) 207 243 6122
F: +44 (0) 207 022 1721
M: +44 (0) 7990 625 169
www.mcevedy.eu
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
This email and its attachments are confidential and
intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). This email and its
attachments may also be legally privileged. If you have received this in
error, please let us know by reply immediately and destroy the email and
its attachments without reading, copying or forwarding the contents.
This email does not create a solicitor-client
relationship and no retainer is created by this email communication.
From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 25 September 2009 19:40
To: Victoria McEvedy; Julie Hedlund; gnso-osc-csg
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask
4: Draft Tool Kit Recommendations
We did not reach unanimous consensus. It remains to be
seen whether there is rough consensus.
Chuck
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Victoria McEvedy
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 1:11 PM
To: Julie Hedlund; gnso-osc-csg
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1,
Subtask 4: Draft Tool Kit Recommendations
Thanks Julie I will be reverting with comments
on Monday.
We already dealt with (3) on the call and failed
to reach a rough consensus as I understood it?
Best,
Victoria McEvedy
Principal
McEvedys
Solicitors and Attorneys
96 Westbourne Park Road
London
W2 5PL
T: +44 (0) 207 243 6122
F: +44 (0) 207 022 1721
M: +44 (0) 7990 625 169
www.mcevedy.eu
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority
#465972
This email and its attachments are confidential
and intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). This email and
its attachments may also be legally privileged. If you have received
this in error, please let us know by reply immediately and destroy the
email and its attachments without reading, copying or forwarding the
contents.
This email does not create a solicitor-client
relationship and no retainer is created by this email communication.
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: 25 September 2009 16:36
To: gnso-osc-csg
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1,
Subtask 4: Draft Tool Kit Recommendations
Dear Work Team members,
On today's call we discussed the final draft of
the Tool Kit Services Recommendations for GNSO Organizations (Draft 3 11
Sept 09), which incorporates changes suggested by Claudio. On the call
we decided to circulate this final draft to allow time for those who
have not already done so to comment on the document. The Work Team is
asking for a response from you, no later than Tuesday, 29 September, on
the following:
1. Any suggested changes to Draft 3 of the
Tool Kit Services Recommendations
2. If no suggested changes, please affirm
that you agree with the final draft version of the Recommendations
3. Please indicate whether these
Recommendations should be provided a) to the OSC as soon as they are
agreed to by the Work Team; b) along with Recommendations for the other
Subtasks; or c) please let us know if you have suggestions for another
way to handle these Recommendations.
Also, those of you who were at the meeting
please feel free to add comments or clarifications to my summary of this
action item from our meeting. Please let me know if you have any
questions.
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
Julie
__________ Information from ESET NOD32
Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4457 (20090925)
__________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32
Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4458 (20090925)
__________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus,
version of virus signature database 4458 (20090925) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus,
version of virus signature database 4458 (20090925) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of
virus signature database 4458 (20090925) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of
virus signature database 4458 (20090925) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|