Re: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask 4: Draft Tool Kit Recommendations

["Zahid Jamil" <zahid@xxxxxxxxx>]

I agree with Chuck.  The language and tone of that email was offensive- almost 
an allegation against staff who have been working hard helping all of us on 
several issues. I would advise more discretion in the use of language.  After 
all this is supposed to be a constructive and disciplined exercise.








Sincerely,

Zahid Jamil
Barrister-at-law
Jamil & Jamil
Barristers-at-law
219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
Cell: +923008238230
Tel: +92 21 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025
Fax: +92 21 5655026
www.jamilandjamil.com
 
Notice / Disclaimer
This message contains confidential information and its contents are being 
communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this 
message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may 
contain/are the intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law, and 
constitute privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The 
reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever 
of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by 
electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use 
of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of Jamil & 
Jamil is prohibited.


Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device

-----Original Message-----
From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 08:20:00 
To: SS Kshatriy<sskshatriy@xxxxxxxxx>; gnso-osc-csg<gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>; 
Julie Hedlund<julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask 4: Draft Tool Kit 
Recommendations

SS,
 
What is a "cooked argument"?
 
We clearly discussed item 3 in our meeting so to continue that
discussion seems perfectly appropriate unless of course you are more
interested in delays rather than progress, which I would like to believe
is not the case.
 
Just to cover the bases, as one member of the WT, I would request that
those who have not expressed their view on item 3 do so after they
review it.
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of SS Kshatriy
        Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 11:58 PM
        To: gnso-osc-csg; Julie Hedlund
        Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask 4:
Draft Tool Kit Recommendations
        
        
Dear Julie,
You have exeeded your brief.
You were told by Chair only to re-circulate the draft for the members to
look afresh and comment.
Chair was very clear that disussions were inconclusive and these are to
be carried forward through email discussion.
You will better be advised to go through the recordings and make
detailed minutes on who said what since some members may jump to
conclusion on cooked arguments.
best regards,
SS
--
--- On Fri, 9/25/09, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



        From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
        Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask 4: Draft
Tool Kit Recommendations
        To: "gnso-osc-csg" <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
        Date: Friday, September 25, 2009, 8:36 AM
        
        
        Dear Work Team members,
        
        On today's call we discussed the final draft of the Tool Kit
Services Recommendations for GNSO Organizations (Draft 3 11 Sept 09),
which incorporates changes suggested by Claudio.  On the call we decided
to circulate this final draft to allow time for those who have not
already done so to comment on the document.  The Work Team is asking for
a response from you, no later than Tuesday, 29 September, on the
following:
        
        

        1.      Any suggested changes to Draft 3 of the Tool Kit
Services Recommendations 
        2.      If no suggested changes, please affirm that you agree
with the final draft version of the Recommendations 
        3.      Please indicate whether these Recommendations should be
provided  a) to the OSC as soon as they are agreed to by the Work Team;
b) along with Recommendations for the other Subtasks; or c) please let
us know if you have suggestions for another way to handle these
Recommendations.
                

        
        Also, those of you who were at the meeting please feel free to
add comments or clarifications to my summary of this action item from
our meeting. Please let me know if you have any questions.
        
        Thank you very much.
        
        Best regards,
        
        Julie