Re: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask 4: Draft Tool Kit Recommendations

["Anthony Harris" <harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree with Chuck and Zahid, staff
deserve more respect for their work.

Tony Harris
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Zahid Jamil 
  To: Gomes, Chuck ; owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx ; SS Kshatriy ; gnso-osc-csg 
; Julie Hedlund 
  Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 9:27 AM
  Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask 4: Draft Tool Kit 
Recommendations


  I agree with Chuck. The language and tone of that email was offensive- almost 
an allegation against staff who have been working hard helping all of us on 
several issues. I would advise more discretion in the use of language. After 
all this is supposed to be a constructive and disciplined exercise.








  Sincerely,

  Zahid Jamil
  Barrister-at-law
  Jamil & Jamil
  Barristers-at-law
  219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
  Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
  Cell: +923008238230
  Tel: +92 21 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025
  Fax: +92 21 5655026
  www.jamilandjamil.com

  Notice / Disclaimer
  This message contains confidential information and its contents are being 
communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
  Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this 
message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may 
contain/are the intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law, and 
constitute privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The 
reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever 
of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by 
electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use 
of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of Jamil & 
Jamil is prohibited.


  Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 
  Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 08:20:00 -0400
  To: SS Kshatriy<sskshatriy@xxxxxxxxx>; gnso-osc-csg<gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>; 
Julie Hedlund<julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
  Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask 4: Draft Tool Kit 
Recommendations


  SS,

  What is a "cooked argument"?

  We clearly discussed item 3 in our meeting so to continue that discussion 
seems perfectly appropriate unless of course you are more interested in delays 
rather than progress, which I would like to believe is not the case.

  Just to cover the bases, as one member of the WT, I would request that those 
who have not expressed their view on item 3 do so after they review it.

  Chuck



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of SS Kshatriy
    Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 11:58 PM
    To: gnso-osc-csg; Julie Hedlund
    Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask 4: Draft Tool Kit 
Recommendations


          Dear Julie,
          You have exeeded your brief.
          You were told by Chair only to re-circulate the draft for the members 
to look afresh and comment.
          Chair was very clear that disussions were inconclusive and these are 
to be carried forward through email discussion.
          You will better be advised to go through the recordings and make 
detailed minutes on who said what since some members may jump to conclusion on 
cooked arguments.
          best regards,
          SS
          --
          --- On Fri, 9/25/09, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


            From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
            Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask 4: Draft Tool 
Kit Recommendations
            To: "gnso-osc-csg" <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
            Date: Friday, September 25, 2009, 8:36 AM


            Dear Work Team members,

            On today’s call we discussed the final draft of the Tool Kit 
Services Recommendations for GNSO Organizations (Draft 3 11 Sept 09), which 
incorporates changes suggested by Claudio.  On the call we decided to circulate 
this final draft to allow time for those who have not already done so to 
comment on the document.  The Work Team is asking for a response from you, no 
later than Tuesday, 29 September, on the following:


              1.. Any suggested changes to Draft 3 of the Tool Kit Services 
Recommendations 
              2.. If no suggested changes, please affirm that you agree with 
the final draft version of the Recommendations 
              3.. Please indicate whether these Recommendations should be 
provided  a) to the OSC as soon as they are agreed to by the Work Team; b) 
along with Recommendations for the other Subtasks; or c) please let us know if 
you have suggestions for another way to handle these Recommendations.


            Also, those of you who were at the meeting please feel free to add 
comments or clarifications to my summary of this action item from our meeting. 
Please let me know if you have any questions.

            Thank you very much.

            Best regards,

            Julie