<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-osc-csg] September 25 meeting-MP3 transcript-sorry-Correction
- To: Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, owner-gnso <owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>, OSC-CSG Work Team <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] September 25 meeting-MP3 transcript-sorry-Correction
- From: SS Kshatriy <sskshatriy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 07:11:10 -0700 (PDT)
Sorry Victoria and Olga,
The mail is addressed to Olga and not Victoria.
Olga is requested to take note of my request.
regards,
SS
--
--- On Thu, 10/8/09, SS Kshatriy <sskshatriy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: SS Kshatriy <sskshatriy@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] September 25 meeting-MP3 transcript
To: "Olga Cavalli" <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "owner-gnso"
<owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>, "OSC-CSG Work Team" <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, October 8, 2009, 5:17 AM
Dear Victoria,
I wanted to refer to September 25 meeting-MP3 transcript while preparing
Minority Report.
I found that there are several missing words, sentences.
Some statements are against my name which I had not said.
In a controvery, each word, phrase and sentence become important.
as such, this transcript can't be said to be a Authoritative Document.
I suggest that:
1. Please arrange for an authoritative transcript. There may be some such
facilities /precedents.
2. Until then, OR,
please inform all concerned that this Transcript should not be quoted in
communications.
And,
A note should be inserted at the top of the transcrip that:
"For any Authoritative reference, please refer to MP3 recordings."
-
best regards,
SS
-
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|