RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Uniformity

["Victoria McEvedy" <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Claudio--just a marker that I will respond to this in detail next week. 

Regards, 

Victoria McEvedy
Principal 
McEvedys
Solicitors and Attorneys 


96 Westbourne Park Road 
London 
W2 5PL

T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122
F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721
M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169 

www.mcevedy.eu  
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the exclusive 
use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may also be legally 
privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us know by reply 
immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without reading, copying 
or forwarding the contents.
This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no retainer is 
created by this email communication. 


-----Original Message-----
From: Claudio Di Gangi [mailto:cdigangi@xxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 10 October 2009 02:20
To: Victoria McEvedy; zahid@xxxxxxxxx; Glen de Saint Géry; 
owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-osc-csg
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Uniformity

Dear SS,

I am writing this to you as our Subtask team leader.

I hope this clarifies the question you asked on the call today. I do not 
consider "membership eligibility criteria" as one of the participation rules or 
operating procedures categories where it makes sense to have a uniform rule in 
place concerning "whom" or "what" is eligible to join a particular group. The 
groups should set these rules with ICANN's approval. The GNSO is made up of a 
diverse group of constituents (commercial interests, individuals, 
organizations, registries, registrars, etc.) 

All of these constituents are eligible to form groups and participate in the 
GNSO, so having one uniform rule dealing with eligibility is inconsistent.  In 
the restructured GNSO, in the contracted party house of the GNSO, groups form 
and participate at the Stakeholder Group level. In the non contracting party 
house, groups form and participate at the Constituency level.

Hope this was helpful. Thanks for your continued work on the draft.

Claudio
 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4494 (20091009) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
 
 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4494 (20091009) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com