<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Uniformity
- To: "Rafik Dammak" <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Uniformity
- From: "Zahid Jamil" <zahid@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:06:00 +0000
I see an obvious contradiction between the two statements from the email below?:
'I think that we should:- behave in the way to only defend the interests of
our respective constituency instead looking for a common ground.'
And
'I disagree with any attempt to defend the particular interest
of constituency by trying to setup a lot of exceptions which de facto means the
maintain of statu quo.'
How can we 'only defend the interests of our respective constituency' and yet
not 'defend the particular interest of constituency'. ?
------Original Message------
From: Rafik Dammak
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: victoria@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: zahid@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Glen@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Uniformity
Sent: 10 Oct 2009 17:10
Hello , I think that we should: - behave in the way to only defend the
interests of our respective constituency instead looking for a common ground. I
want to talk that because the discussion about uniformity which is aimed to
make charters, bylaws and so on more coherent between all constituencies. I
disagree with any attempt to defend the particular interest of constituency by
trying to setup a lot of exceptions which de facto means the maintain of statu
quo. we are in the process of improvement and restructuring not in process
of maintain the same situation and label it differently. -avoid the "push" way.
I believe that usually make the opposite expected result, even me I don't like
be pushed even "friendly". - reach rough consensus : easy to state , hard to
achieve. the matter is not to defend and advocate our proposal but find joint
ones. I agree for reopening issues but I think that should be exceptional. we
are a work team and not a diplomacy arena where a long
negotiation predominates without clear outcomes. Rafik 2009/10/11 Gomes, Chuck
<cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> I would add that there is precidence for reopening
issues. In the new gTLD process, several issues have been reopened. Our goal
is to get the strongest possible consensus as possible. We cannot do that by
excluding key view points. Chuck From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck Sent: Friday,
October 09, 2009 10:27 PM To: victoria@xxxxxxxxxx; zahid@xxxxxxxxx;
Glen@xxxxxxxxx; owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx Subject:
Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Uniformity I am not aware of any restriction about reopening
an issue. Regardless, everyone in the subgroup must be given the opportunity to
voice their support for a position and thereby be counted in the determination
of rough consensus on the issue. Chuck Chuck Gomes
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx To: Victoria McEvedy ; zahid@xxxxxxxxx ;
Glen de Saint Géry ; owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx ; gnso-osc-csg Sent: Fri Oct
09 18:45:5
Sincerely,
Zahid Jamil
Barrister-at-law
Jamil & Jamil
Barristers-at-law
219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
Cell: +923008238230
Tel: +92 21 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025
Fax: +92 21 5655026
www.jamilandjamil.com
Notice / Disclaimer
This message contains confidential information and its contents are being
communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended
recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may
contain/are the intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law, and
constitute privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The
reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever
of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by
electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use
of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of Jamil &
Jamil is prohibited.
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|