<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 05 February Meeting
- To: gnso-osc-csg <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 05 February Meeting
- From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 13:57:10 -0800
Dear Work Team members,
Here are the actions/summary from today’s meeting. Please note that our next
meeting will be held next Friday, 12 February at 1300 UTC/0500 PST/0800 EST and
is scheduled for 90 minutes. Note also that on today’s call Work Team members
discussed whether to keep the same time, realizing that it is difficult for
Chuck and Krista. However, as the time accommodated most Work Team members’
schedule, it was decided to keep the same time slot.
Note that the actions and summary also are included on our wiki at:
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team. Changes
to the Task 1, Subtask 1 document are included on the wiki at:
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_stakeholder_group_operations_work_team_task_1_subtask_1
and the Task 1, Subtask 2 document at:
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_and_stake_holder_group_operations_work_team_task_1_subtask_2.
Changes are shown in ALL CAPS and strikeout, as appropriate. Those that are
suggested but not agreed are enclosed in curly brackets {}.
Thank you very much and I hope you have a nice weekend.
Best regards,
Julie
Actions/Summary:
Task 1, Subtask 1
1. Work Team members are requested to review the text of Task 1, Subtask 1 and
provide final comments by Friday, 12 February.
2. Claudio and other Work Team members will suggest alternate language for
Section 3 Policy and Consensus, Second Paragraph and will post suggestions and
comments to the email list.
3. Rafik will provide comments on Section 2f (language suggested by ICANN Legal
staff).
Task 1, Subtask 2
1. Victoria and Work Team members are requested to review suggested changes to
Task 1, Subtask 2.
2. Victoria is requested to clarify the meaning of Section 1.5 Process Issues
in comments on the list.
3. Work Team members asked Julie to confirm the citation for the quote
"unacceptably high information costs" in Section 1.2 Improvements. Julie
confirmed that the quote, as noted in Victoria's original document, is from the
LSE Report on page 9.
4. Work Team members asked Julie to confirm the link to the "best and worst
practices" document in Section 1.4 Methods. Julie corrected the link and notes
that the reference is to the "Revised Constituency Analysis" document.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|