ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-osc-csg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 05 February Meeting

  • To: gnso-osc-csg <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 05 February Meeting
  • From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 13:57:10 -0800

Dear Work Team members,

Here are the actions/summary from today’s meeting.  Please note that our next 
meeting will be held next Friday, 12 February at 1300 UTC/0500 PST/0800 EST and 
is scheduled for 90 minutes.  Note also that on today’s call Work Team members 
discussed whether to keep the same time, realizing that it is difficult for 
Chuck and Krista.  However, as the time accommodated most Work Team members’ 
schedule, it was decided to keep the same time slot.

Note that the actions and summary also are included on our wiki at: 
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team.  Changes 
to the Task 1, Subtask 1 document are included on the wiki at: 
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_stakeholder_group_operations_work_team_task_1_subtask_1
 and the Task 1, Subtask 2 document at: 
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_and_stake_holder_group_operations_work_team_task_1_subtask_2.
  Changes are shown in ALL CAPS and strikeout, as appropriate.  Those that are 
suggested but not agreed are enclosed in curly brackets {}.

Thank you very much and I hope you have a nice weekend.

Best regards,

Julie

Actions/Summary:

Task 1, Subtask 1
1. Work Team members are requested to review the text of Task 1, Subtask 1 and 
provide final comments by Friday, 12 February.
2. Claudio and other Work Team members will suggest alternate language for 
Section 3 Policy and Consensus, Second Paragraph and will post suggestions and 
comments to the email list.
3. Rafik will provide comments on Section 2f (language suggested by ICANN Legal 
staff).

Task 1, Subtask 2
1. Victoria and Work Team members are requested to review suggested changes to 
Task 1, Subtask 2.
2. Victoria is requested to clarify the meaning of Section 1.5 Process Issues 
in comments on the list.
3. Work Team members asked Julie to confirm the citation for the quote 
"unacceptably high information costs" in Section 1.2 Improvements. Julie 
confirmed that the quote, as noted in Victoria's original document, is from the 
LSE Report on page 9.
4. Work Team members asked Julie to confirm the link to the "best and worst 
practices" document in Section 1.4 Methods. Julie corrected the link and notes 
that the reference is to the "Revised Constituency Analysis" document.



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy