RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 05 February Meeting

["Papac, Krista" <Krista.Papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Olga,

 

Is it possible to extend the deadline by one Friday?  I have been out of
the office traveling to offsite meetings for the past several weeks and
will be back in Friday afternoon.  I don't know that I will have time to
review these changes by this Friday, but want to make sure I do before
we finalize them.

 

Thank you,

Krista 

 

Krista Papac 
Sales Executive 
Iron Mountain Digital 
5530 Bandini Blvd 
Bell, CA  90201  US 
Home Office: +1.714.846.8780 
Mobile: +1.714.865.7655 
Fax: +1.323.443.3573 
krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  

 

"Software Escrow for Dummies" - order your complimentary copy today at
<http://www.ironmountain.com/escrowfordummies>
www.ironmountain.com/escrowfordummies
<http://www.ironmountain.com/escrowfordummies> 

 

New Gartner Report: Successful Software Escrow Requires Planning and
Negotiation

Gartner advises: "It is also important that the licensee continue to
track the software vendor's financials and viability annually, because
any signs of financial problems would justify the cost of verification
services." Continue reading the full report at:
http://www.gartner.com/technology/media-products/reprints/ironmountain/1
70569.html
<http://www.gartner.com/technology/media-products/reprints/ironmountain/
170569.html> 

 

________________________________

From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Olga Cavalli
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 7:05 PM
To: Julie Hedlund
Cc: gnso-osc-csg
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 05 February Meeting

 

Thanks Julie for this helpful summary.
For those not present in the call today, I encourage you to review the
changes and additions made to the text which can be easily identified in
the wiki, and send comments in our email list during this week.
If we do not hear any comment by next Friday before the call, then we
can consider these changes agreed by the working team.
As I said in the call I will do my best to join the call next Friday,
although I may be in a plane flying to Tokyo. In this case Michael will
be charing the call.
Best regards
Olga




2010/2/5 Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>

Dear Work Team members,

Here are the actions/summary from today's meeting.  Please note that our
next meeting will be held next Friday, 12 February at 1300 UTC/0500
PST/0800 EST and is scheduled for 90 minutes.  Note also that on today's
call Work Team members discussed whether to keep the same time,
realizing that it is difficult for Chuck and Krista.  However, as the
time accommodated most Work Team members' schedule, it was decided to
keep the same time slot.

Note that the actions and summary also are included on our wiki at:
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team.
Changes to the Task 1, Subtask 1 document are included on the wiki at:
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_stakeholder_group_
operations_work_team_task_1_subtask_1 and the Task 1, Subtask 2 document
at:
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_and_stake_holder_g
roup_operations_work_team_task_1_subtask_2.  Changes are shown in ALL
CAPS and strikeout, as appropriate.  Those that are suggested but not
agreed are enclosed in curly brackets {}.

Thank you very much and I hope you have a nice weekend.

Best regards,

Julie

Actions/Summary:

Task 1, Subtask 1
1. Work Team members are requested to review the text of Task 1, Subtask
1 and provide final comments by Friday, 12 February.
2. Claudio and other Work Team members will suggest alternate language
for Section 3 Policy and Consensus, Second Paragraph and will post
suggestions and comments to the email list.
3. Rafik will provide comments on Section 2f (language suggested by
ICANN Legal staff).

Task 1, Subtask 2
1. Victoria and Work Team members are requested to review suggested
changes to Task 1, Subtask 2.
2. Victoria is requested to clarify the meaning of Section 1.5 Process
Issues in comments on the list.
3. Work Team members asked Julie to confirm the citation for the quote
"unacceptably high information costs" in Section 1.2 Improvements. Julie
confirmed that the quote, as noted in Victoria's original document, is
from the LSE Report on page 9.
4. Work Team members asked Julie to confirm the link to the "best and
worst practices" document in Section 1.4 Methods. Julie corrected the
link and notes that the reference is to the "Revised Constituency
Analysis" document.

 



The information contained in this email message and its attachments
is intended
only for the private and confidential use of the recipient(s) named
above, unless the sender expressly agrees otherwise. Transmission
of email over the Internet
 is not a secure communications medium. If you are requesting or
have requested
the transmittal of personal data, as defined in applicable privacy
laws by means
 of email or in an attachment to email you must select a more
secure alternate means of transmittal that supports your
obligations to protect such personal data. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient and/or you have received this
email in error, you must take no action based on the information in
this email and you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
misuse, copying, or disclosure of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received
this communication in error, please notify us immediately by email
and delete the original message.