Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 05 February Meeting

[Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Working Team,

We have a request from Krista about extending the revision for one more week.
What do others think?
In the mean time, I suggest that we keep on with the revision of the
documents as agreed in the last conference call.
Also remember our pending tasks:

Actions/Summary:

Task 1, Subtask 1
1. Work Team members are requested to review the text of Task 1,
Subtask 1 and provide final comments by Friday, 12 February. TO BE
EXTENDED?
2. Claudio and other Work Team members will suggest alternate language
for Section 3 Policy and Consensus, Second Paragraph and will post
suggestions and comments to the email list.
3. Rafik will provide comments on Section 2f (language suggested by
ICANN Legal staff).

Task 1, Subtask 2
1. Victoria and Work Team members are requested to review suggested
changes to Task 1, Subtask 2.
2. Victoria is requested to clarify the meaning of Section 1.5 Process
Issues in comments on the list.
3. Work Team members asked Julie to confirm the citation for the quote
"unacceptably high information costs" in Section 1.2 Improvements.
Julie confirmed that the quote, as noted in Victoria's original
document, is from the LSE Report on page 9.
4. Work Team members asked Julie to confirm the link to the "best and
worst practices" document in Section 1.4 Methods. Julie corrected the
link and notes that the reference is to the "Revised Constituency
Analysis" document.

I will be travelling so I may not be able to lead the call, in this
case Michael will be charing it.

Regards,

Olga


2010/2/8 Papac, Krista <Krista.Papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Olga,
>
>
>
> Is it possible to extend the deadline by one Friday?  I have been out of the
> office traveling to offsite meetings for the past several weeks and will be
> back in Friday afternoon.  I don’t know that I will have time to review
> these changes by this Friday, but want to make sure I do before we finalize
> them.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Krista
>
>
>
> Krista Papac
> Sales Executive
> Iron Mountain Digital
> 5530 Bandini Blvd
> Bell, CA  90201  US
> Home Office: +1.714.846.8780
> Mobile: +1.714.865.7655
> Fax: +1.323.443.3573
> krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> “Software Escrow for Dummies” - order your complimentary copy today at
> www.ironmountain.com/escrowfordummies
>
>
>
> New Gartner Report: Successful Software Escrow Requires Planning and
> Negotiation
>
> Gartner advises: “It is also important that the licensee continue to track
> the software vendor’s financials and viability annually, because any signs
> of financial problems would justify the cost of verification services.”
> Continue reading the full report at:
> http://www.gartner.com/technology/media-products/reprints/ironmountain/170569.html
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Olga Cavalli
> Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 7:05 PM
> To: Julie Hedlund
> Cc: gnso-osc-csg
> Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 05 February Meeting
>
>
>
> Thanks Julie for this helpful summary.
> For those not present in the call today, I encourage you to review the
> changes and additions made to the text which can be easily identified in the
> wiki, and send comments in our email list during this week.
> If we do not hear any comment by next Friday before the call, then we can
> consider these changes agreed by the working team.
> As I said in the call I will do my best to join the call next Friday,
> although I may be in a plane flying to Tokyo. In this case Michael will be
> charing the call.
> Best regards
> Olga
>
>
> 2010/2/5 Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Dear Work Team members,
>
> Here are the actions/summary from today’s meeting.  Please note that our
> next meeting will be held next Friday, 12 February at 1300 UTC/0500 PST/0800
> EST and is scheduled for 90 minutes.  Note also that on today’s call Work
> Team members discussed whether to keep the same time, realizing that it is
> difficult for Chuck and Krista.  However, as the time accommodated most Work
> Team members’ schedule, it was decided to keep the same time slot.
>
> Note that the actions and summary also are included on our wiki at:
> https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team.
>  Changes to the Task 1, Subtask 1 document are included on the wiki at:
> https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_stakeholder_group_operations_work_team_task_1_subtask_1
> and the Task 1, Subtask 2 document at:
> https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_and_stake_holder_group_operations_work_team_task_1_subtask_2.
>  Changes are shown in ALL CAPS and strikeout, as appropriate.  Those that
> are suggested but not agreed are enclosed in curly brackets {}.
>
> Thank you very much and I hope you have a nice weekend.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Julie
>
> Actions/Summary:
>
> Task 1, Subtask 1
> 1. Work Team members are requested to review the text of Task 1, Subtask 1
> and provide final comments by Friday, 12 February.
> 2. Claudio and other Work Team members will suggest alternate language for
> Section 3 Policy and Consensus, Second Paragraph and will post suggestions
> and comments to the email list.
> 3. Rafik will provide comments on Section 2f (language suggested by ICANN
> Legal staff).
>
> Task 1, Subtask 2
> 1. Victoria and Work Team members are requested to review suggested changes
> to Task 1, Subtask 2.
> 2. Victoria is requested to clarify the meaning of Section 1.5 Process
> Issues in comments on the list.
> 3. Work Team members asked Julie to confirm the citation for the quote
> "unacceptably high information costs" in Section 1.2 Improvements. Julie
> confirmed that the quote, as noted in Victoria's original document, is from
> the LSE Report on page 9.
> 4. Work Team members asked Julie to confirm the link to the "best and worst
> practices" document in Section 1.4 Methods. Julie corrected the link and
> notes that the reference is to the "Revised Constituency Analysis" document.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> The information contained in this email message and its attachments is
> intended only for the private and confidential use of the recipient(s) named
> above, unless the sender expressly agrees otherwise. Transmission of email
> over the Internet is not a secure communications medium. If you are
> requesting or have requested the transmittal of personal data, as defined in
> applicable privacy laws by means of email or in an attachment to email you
> must select a more secure alternate means of transmittal that supports your
> obligations to protect such personal data. If the reader of this message is
> not the intended recipient and/or you have received this email in error, you
> must take no action based on the information in this email and you are
> hereby notified that any dissemination, misuse, copying, or disclosure of
> this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify us immediately by email and delete the
> original message.