<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-osc-csg] RE: Actions/Summary: 26 March 2010 Meeting --- Subtask 1.3 Current Version for ALL WT Feedback
- To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] RE: Actions/Summary: 26 March 2010 Meeting --- Subtask 1.3 Current Version for ALL WT Feedback
- From: Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:49:18 -0300
Thanks Julie
Regards
Olga
2010/3/29 Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
> Dear Work Team members,
>
> I have loaded the updated Task 1, Subtask 3 document to the wiki at:
> https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_stakeholder_group_ops_work_team_task_1_subtask_3
> .
>
> Thank you,
>
> Julie
>
>
>
> On 3/29/10 12:44 PM, "Krista Papac" <Krista.Papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Please note, this document has been updated/changed since the last time I
> forwarded it to the list – so you will want to re-review it.
>
> Thank you,
> Krista
>
>
> Krista Papac
> Iron Mountain Digital
> 5530 Bandini Blvd
> Bell, CA 90201 US
>
> Home Office: +1.714.846.8780
> Mobile: +1.714.865.7655
> Fax: +1.323.443.3573
> krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>
>
> *“Software Escrow for Dummies” - order your complimentary copy t*oday at
> <http://www.ironmountain.com/escrowfordummies>
> www.ironmountain.com/escrowfordummies <
> http://www.ironmountain.com/escrowfordummies>
>
> *New Gartner Report: Successful Software Escrow Requires Planning and
> Negotiation
> *
> Gartner advises: “It is also important that the licensee continue to track
> the software vendor’s financials and viability annually, because any signs
> of financial problems would justify the cost of verification services.”
> Continue reading the full report at:
> http://www.gartner.com/technology/media-products/reprints/ironmountain/170569.html<
> http://www.gartner.com/technology/media-products/reprints/ironmountain/170569.html>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Olga Cavalli [mailto:olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>]
>
> *Sent:* Monday, March 29, 2010 4:54 AM
> *To:* Papac, Krista
> *Cc:* Julie Hedlund; gnso-osc-csg
> *Subject:* Re: [gnso-osc-csg] RE: Actions/Summary: 26 March 2010 Meeting
> --- Subtask 1.3 Current Version for ALL WT Feedback
>
> Thank you very much Krista for sending this document.
> Although it has been already reviewed by the WT, please send any comments
> or suggested changes no latter than April 9th.
> Regards
> Olga
>
> 2010/3/28 Papac, Krista <Krista.Papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> All,
>
> Attached is the latest version of Subtask 1.3 recommendations. It is open
> to the entire WT for comment.
>
> Thank you,
> Krista
>
>
> Krista Papac
> Iron Mountain Digital
> 5530 Bandini Blvd
> Bell, CA 90201 US
>
> Home Office: +1.714.846.8780
> Mobile: +1.714.865.7655
> Fax: +1.323.443.3573
> krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>
>
> *“Software Escrow for Dummies”* - order your complimentary copy today at <
> http://www.ironmountain.com/escrowfordummies>
> www.ironmountain.com/escrowfordummies <
> http://www.ironmountain.com/escrowfordummies>
>
> *New Gartner Report: Successful Software Escrow Requires Planning and
> Negotiation
> *
> Gartner advises: “It is also important that the licensee continue to track
> the software vendor’s financials and viability annually, because any signs
> of financial problems would justify the cost of verification services.”
> Continue reading the full report at:
> http://www.gartner.com/technology/media-products/reprints/ironmountain/170569.html<
> http://www.gartner.com/technology/media-products/reprints/ironmountain/170569.html>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx<owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>]
> *On Behalf Of *Julie Hedlund
> *Sent:* Friday, March 26, 2010 12:48 PM
> *To:* gnso-osc-csg
> *Subject:* [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 26 March 2010 Meeting
>
> Dear Work Team members,
>
> Here are the actions/summary from today’s meeting and posted on the wiki
> at: *https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team
> *.. Please let me know if you have any changes or questions. Our next
> meeting will be held *Friday, 09 April at 1300 UTC/0600 PST/0900 EST for
> one hour.* Thank you very much.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Julie
>
> *Action Items*:
> *1. Task 1, Subtask 2: (See the wiki at: **
> https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_and_stake_holder_group_operations_work_team_task_1_subtask_2
> *. )
> *A) CHANGES THROUGH SECTION 8:
> *
>
> - *Work Team members should review all changes through Section 8.
> Policy and provide comments to the list not later than Friday, 01 April. It
> will be assumed that all changes are agreed to if no comments are received.
> *
> - *Rafik Dammak* agreed to ask Mary Wong if she had suggestions for
> alternative language for Section 8. Policy, paragraph b. "Committee
> meetings
> should be open for attendance by all {GROUP} members –- and at the election
> of the Constituency -- to the public.”
> - *Krista Papac* agreed to review Claudio DiGangi's suggested language
> (added to the wiki) to Section 4. Voting as it also could be applied to
> Section 1. Executive Committees to maintain consistency.
>
> *B) REMAINING SECTIONS:* *Work Team members should review the remaining
> sections of Task 1, Subtask 2 and send comments to the list:
> *
>
> - *9. GNSO WG; *
> - *10. Reference to Code of Practice at Annex B (and Annex B text); *
> - *11. Reference to Handbook on Common Rules and Principles; *
> - *12. Reference to recommendations applying to Contracted House
> Stakeholder Groups; and *
> - *Part IV: Analysis*
>
>
> *2. Task 1, Subtask 3: Julie will load the latest version from Krista on
> the wiki.* Work Team members are requested to review the document in
> preparation for the meeting on Friday, 09 April.
>
> *3. Task 2: Outreach:* *Debbie Hughes will provide some ideas to begin the
> discussion on the Sub Team. *The Sub Team members are: Debbie (leader),
> Olga Cavalli, Rafik Dammak, Claudio DiGangi, Chuck Gomes, and Michael Young.
>
> *Summary:
> *
>
> - Olga noted that Philip Sheppard, the new Chair of the Operations
> Steering Committee, has requested that the Work Team complete its work by
> 01
> June in preparation for the ICANN meeting in Brussels. Olga explained to
> Philip that the Work Team might not be able to complete Task 2, but would
> complete the remaining subtasks of Task 1. She recommended that the Work
> Team should finish Task 1, Subtask 2 by the next meeting and begin a review
> of Task 1, Subtask 3, and asked Krista to send the latest version for Julie
> to load on the wiki.
> - The Work Team discussed additional changes to Section 1. Elections
> and Section 4. Voting. Claudio provided revised language to the list for
> consideration. Krista agreed to review Section 1. Elections in view of
> Claudio's revised language.
> - The Work Team agreed to retain the previous changes in Section 5.
> Voting. Rafik agreed to ask Mary Wong if she had suggestions for
> alternative
> language for Section 8. Policy, paragraph b. "Committee meetings should be
> open for attendance by all Constituency {GROUP} members –- and at the
> election of the Constituency -- to the public."
> - On Task 2, Olga asked for volunteers for a Task Sub Team. Debbie
> Hughes agreed to be the leader of the Sub Team and the other volunteers
> were: Olga Cavalli, Rafik Dammak, Claudio DiGangi, Chuck Gomes, and Michael
> Young.
> -
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *The information contained in this email message and its attachments is
> intended only for the private and confidential use of the recipient(s) named
> above, unless the sender expressly agrees otherwise. Transmission of email
> over the Internet is not a secure communications medium. If you are
> requesting or have requested the transmittal of personal data, as defined in
> applicable privacy laws by means of email or in an attachment to email, you
> must select a more secure alternate means of transmittal that supports your
> obligations to protect such personal data. If the reader of this message is
> not the intended recipient and/or you have received this email in error, you
> must take no action based on the information in this email and you are
> hereby notified that any dissemination, misuse or copying or disclosure of
> this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify us immediately by email and delete the
> original message.
> *
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *The information contained in this email message and its attachments is
> intended only for the private and confidential use of the recipient(s) named
> above, unless the sender expressly agrees otherwise. Transmission of email
> over the Internet is not a secure communications medium. If you are
> requesting or have requested the transmittal of personal data, as defined in
> applicable privacy laws by means of email or in an attachment to email, you
> must select a more secure alternate means of transmittal that supports your
> obligations to protect such personal data. If the reader of this message is
> not the intended recipient and/or you have received this email in error, you
> must take no action based on the information in this email and you are
> hereby notified that any dissemination, misuse or copying or disclosure of
> this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify us immediately by email and delete the
> original message.
> *
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|