RE: [gnso-osc-csg] RE: Actions/Summary: 26 March 2010 Meeting --- Subtask 1.3 Current Version for ALL WT Feedback

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Krista.  The basic content of this looks pretty good to me.  Some
minor edits are needed but that should be easy.  I am curious to see
what others think.
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Papac, Krista
        Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 12:45 PM
        To: Olga Cavalli
        Cc: Julie Hedlund; gnso-osc-csg
        Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] RE: Actions/Summary: 26 March 2010
Meeting --- Subtask 1.3 Current Version for ALL WT Feedback
        
        

        All,

         

        Please note, this document has been updated/changed since the
last time I forwarded it to the list - so you will want to re-review it.

         

        Thank you,

        Krista 

         

        Krista Papac 
        Iron Mountain Digital 
        5530 Bandini Blvd 
        Bell, CA  90201  US 
        Home Office: +1.714.846.8780 
        Mobile: +1.714.865.7655 
        Fax: +1.323.443.3573 
        krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  

         

        "Software Escrow for Dummies" - order your complimentary copy
today at <http://www.ironmountain.com/escrowfordummies>
www.ironmountain.com/escrowfordummies
<http://www.ironmountain.com/escrowfordummies> 

         

        New Gartner Report: Successful Software Escrow Requires Planning
and Negotiation

        Gartner advises: "It is also important that the licensee
continue to track the software vendor's financials and viability
annually, because any signs of financial problems would justify the cost
of verification services." Continue reading the full report at:
http://www.gartner.com/technology/media-products/reprints/ironmountain/1
70569.html
<http://www.gartner.com/technology/media-products/reprints/ironmountain/
170569.html> 

         

        
________________________________


        From: Olga Cavalli [mailto:olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 4:54 AM
        To: Papac, Krista
        Cc: Julie Hedlund; gnso-osc-csg
        Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] RE: Actions/Summary: 26 March 2010
Meeting --- Subtask 1.3 Current Version for ALL WT Feedback

         

        Thank you very much Krista for sending this document.
        Although it has been already reviewed by the WT, please send any
comments or suggested changes no latter than April 9th.
        Regards
        Olga

        2010/3/28 Papac, Krista <Krista.Papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

        All,

         

        Attached is the latest version of Subtask 1.3 recommendations.
It is open to the entire WT for comment.

         

        Thank you,

        Krista 

         

        Krista Papac 
        Iron Mountain Digital 
        5530 Bandini Blvd 
        Bell, CA  90201  US 
        Home Office: +1.714.846.8780 
        Mobile: +1.714.865.7655 
        Fax: +1.323.443.3573 
        krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:krista.papac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  

         

        "Software Escrow for Dummies" - order your complimentary copy
today at <http://www.ironmountain.com/escrowfordummies>
www.ironmountain.com/escrowfordummies
<http://www.ironmountain.com/escrowfordummies> 

         

        New Gartner Report: Successful Software Escrow Requires Planning
and Negotiation

        Gartner advises: "It is also important that the licensee
continue to track the software vendor's financials and viability
annually, because any signs of financial problems would justify the cost
of verification services." Continue reading the full report at:
http://www.gartner.com/technology/media-products/reprints/ironmountain/1
70569.html
<http://www.gartner.com/technology/media-products/reprints/ironmountain/
170569.html> 

         

        
________________________________


        From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
        Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 12:48 PM
        To: gnso-osc-csg
        Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 26 March 2010 Meeting

         

        Dear Work Team members,
        
        Here are the actions/summary from today's meeting and posted on
the wiki at:
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team..
Please let me know if you have any changes or questions.  Our next
meeting will be held Friday, 09 April at 1300 UTC/0600 PST/0900 EST for
one hour.   Thank you very much.
        
        Best regards,
        
        Julie
        
        Action Items:
        1. Task 1, Subtask 2: (See the wiki at:
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_and_stake_holder_g
roup_operations_work_team_task_1_subtask_2. )
        A) CHANGES THROUGH SECTION 8:

        *       Work Team members should review all changes through
Section 8. Policy and provide comments to the list not later than
Friday, 01 April. It will be assumed that all changes are agreed to if
no comments are received. 
        *       Rafik Dammak agreed to ask Mary Wong if she had
suggestions for alternative language for Section 8. Policy, paragraph b.
"Committee meetings should be open for attendance by all {GROUP} members
-- and at the election of the Constituency -- to the public." 
        *       Krista Papac agreed to review Claudio DiGangi's
suggested language (added to the wiki) to Section 4. Voting as it also
could be applied to Section 1. Executive Committees to maintain
consistency. 

        B) REMAINING SECTIONS: Work Team members should review the
remaining sections of Task 1, Subtask 2 and send comments to the list: 

        *       9. GNSO WG; 
        *       10. Reference to Code of Practice at Annex B (and Annex
B text); 
        *       11. Reference to Handbook on Common Rules and
Principles;   
        *       12. Reference to recommendations applying to Contracted
House Stakeholder Groups; and 
        *       Part IV: Analysis 

        
        2. Task 1, Subtask 3: Julie will load the latest version from
Krista on the wiki. Work Team members are requested to review the
document in preparation for the meeting on Friday, 09 April.
        
        3. Task 2: Outreach: Debbie Hughes will provide some ideas to
begin the discussion on the Sub Team. The Sub Team members are: Debbie
(leader), Olga Cavalli, Rafik Dammak, Claudio DiGangi, Chuck Gomes, and
Michael Young.
        
        Summary:

        *       Olga noted that Philip Sheppard, the new Chair of the
Operations Steering Committee, has requested that the Work Team complete
its work by 01 June in preparation for the ICANN meeting in Brussels.
Olga explained to Philip that the Work Team might not be able to
complete Task 2, but would complete the remaining subtasks of Task 1.
She recommended that the Work Team should finish Task 1, Subtask 2 by
the next meeting and begin a review of Task 1, Subtask 3, and asked
Krista to send the latest version for Julie to load on the wiki. 
        *       The Work Team discussed additional changes to Section 1.
Elections and Section 4. Voting. Claudio provided revised language to
the list for consideration. Krista agreed to review Section 1. Elections
in view of Claudio's revised language. 
        *       The Work Team agreed to retain the previous changes in
Section 5. Voting. Rafik agreed to ask Mary Wong if she had suggestions
for alternative language for Section 8. Policy, paragraph b. "Committee
meetings should be open for attendance by all Constituency {GROUP}
members -- and at the election of the Constituency -- to the public." 
        *       On Task 2, Olga asked for volunteers for a Task Sub
Team. Debbie Hughes agreed to be the leader of the Sub Team and the
other volunteers were: Olga Cavalli, Rafik Dammak, Claudio DiGangi,
Chuck Gomes, and Michael Young. 
        *         

        
________________________________


        The information contained in this email message and its
attachments is intended only for the private and confidential use of the
recipient(s) named above, unless the sender expressly agrees otherwise.
Transmission of email over the Internet is not a secure communications
medium. If you are requesting or have requested the transmittal of
personal data, as defined in applicable privacy laws by means of email
or in an attachment to email, you must select a more secure alternate
means of transmittal that supports your obligations to protect such
personal data. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient and/or you have received this email in error, you must take no
action based on the information in this email and you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, misuse or copying or disclosure of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by email and delete
the original message. 

         

        
________________________________


        

        The information contained in this email message and its
attachments is intended only for the private and confidential use of the
recipient(s) named above, unless the sender expressly agrees otherwise.
Transmission of email over the Internet is not a secure communications
medium. If you are requesting or have requested the transmittal of
personal data, as defined in applicable privacy laws by means of email
or in an attachment to email, you must select a more secure alternate
means of transmittal that supports your obligations to protect such
personal data. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient and/or you have received this email in error, you must take no
action based on the information in this email and you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, misuse or copying or disclosure of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by email and delete
the original message.