Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 09 April 2010 Meeting

[Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Rafik for your comments.

I have been reviewing the structure of the 1.2 document and I have the
following comments:

General comments:

although it is important to understand the ground of our recommendations, in
my oppinion they should not be part of our outcome document that should only
have the recommendations themselves, which should be extracted from the body
of the 1.2 document.


About 3.12    Dealings with Staff: A Code of Practice:

I think this section does not relate with the purpose of the document.


About Schedule I: The BGC’s Guidelines :

as this is a text from the BCG guidelines it can be included in a link in a
footnote.



Regards
Olga

2010/4/13 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>

> Hello,
>
> just an addition to the new part II, section 1:
> "No person shall serve as a GROUP Councilor or Officer or as a Stakeholder
> Group and Constituency Executive Committee member for more than four
> consecutive years."
> as the recommendation is applied to the SG, it should be applied to
> constituency too, maybe we should say "GROUPs Excecutive Committee"
>
>
> Regards
>
> Rafik
>
> 2010/4/10 Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>  Dear Work Team members,
>>
>> Here are the actions/summary from today’s meeting.  Please let me know if
>> you have any changes or questions.  Our next meeting will be held n*ext
>> Friday, 16 April at 1300 UTC/0600 PST/0900 EST for one hour.*  The
>> actions and summary are included on the wiki at: *
>> https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team*.
>>   Please note that because the meeting times are very early for those Work
>> Team members on the West Coast it was suggested that we may wish to select a
>> time later in the day on Friday’s.  However, some Work Team members and
>> staff may have conflicts.  *Please let me know ASAP if you would prefer
>> to move the call to a particular time and I will check to see whether there
>> are staff or other conflicts.  *Thank you.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Julie
>>
>> *Summary/Action Items:
>> 1. Deadlines:* Olga noted that the deadline for submitting the WT's
>> recommendations for Task 1, Subtasks 1-3 to the OSC is 01 June. She asked
>> Julie to compile the Subtask recommendations into one document once they all
>> are approved.
>>
>> *2. Task 1, Subtask 2:* The WT members discussed language for term limits
>> and agreed to an option suggested by Chuck and modified by Tony that would
>> apply term limits to GROUP Councilors and Officers, and to Stakeholder Group
>> Executive Committee members.  Olga asked Julie to draft language for a new
>> section on Term Limits for the WT to review. With respect to Part II,
>> Section 8 Policy, Olga asked Julie to include the language suggested by Mary
>> Wong for the WT to review.  On Annex B, Tony suggested deleting the section
>> and the WT members on the call agreed, noting that there was agreement among
>> WT members at the meeting in Seoul, South Korea also to delete Annex B.
>>  Olga asked Julie to produce a Word document of Task 1, Subtask 2 including
>> the changes agreed to thus far and indicating additions and deletions using
>> tracked changes. * ACTION: WT members should review the attached document
>> and recommend any further changes.  In particular, WT members should note
>> the following 1) new Part II, Section 1 Term Limits; 2) Mary Wong’s proposed
>> language for Section 9c (previously 8c) Policy, and 3) Section 10 GNSO
>> Working Group through to the end of the document.
>> *
>> *3. Task 1, Subtask 3:* Olga noted that no WT members had suggested
>> changes to Subtask 3. Julie suggested resending the document to the WT to
>> confirm that there are no changes and that the text is approved.* ACTION:
>> Work Team members should review the attached document and either recommend
>> any further changes or indicate that they agree to the text.
>> *
>> *4. Task 2:* *ACTION: Debra Hughes is preparing preliminary thoughts.*
>>
>
>