RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 30 April 2010 Meeting

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Julie.  I do not believe that there is any more detail on the
types of research than what is in BGC recommendations.
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 10:50 AM
        To: Gomes, Chuck
        Cc: gnso-osc-csg
        Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 30 April 2010
Meeting
        
        
        Chuck,
        
        On the Task 2 document, the Work Team members on the call asked
whether there was more detailed guidance on the types of outreach
activities that might be included in the recommendations.  Michael asked
whether this could be a question for the OSC, but I offered first to
review the BGC report to see if it could provide more guidance in this
area, which might obviate the need for a request for guidance from the
OSC.  So, I have the action to do some analysis and report to the Work
Team and we'll take it from there.
        
        Thanks,
        Julie
        
        
        On 5/3/10 12:26 AM, "Chuck Gomes" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
        
        

                Thanks Julie.  
                
                The Task 1 document looks good to me except for the two
remaining issues related to the comments I made.  I assume those will be
discussed next Friday.
                
                Regarding the Task 2 document, I do not understand what
type of guidance is needed from the OSC or why guidance is needed.  We
have the BGC report so what is desired from the OSC?
                
                Chuck
                
                

                        
                         
                        
________________________________

                        From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julie  Hedlund
                        Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 5:30 PM
                        To:  gnso-osc-csg
                        Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 30
April 2010  Meeting
                        
                         
                        Dear Work Team members,
                        
                        Here are the  actions/summary from today's
meeting.  Please let me know if you have any  changes or questions.  Our
next meeting will be held next Friday, 07  May at 1300 UTC/0600 PST/0900
EST for one hour.  Scott Pinzon,  Director, Policy
Communications/Information Services, will join us at half  past the hour
during the discussion on outreach to provide information and  answer
questions about current and planned efforts for communications relating
to outreach.  The actions and summary are included on the wiki at:
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team.  
                        
                        Best regards,
                        
                        Julie
                        
                        Discussion/Action  Items:
                        
                        Task 1: Work Team members agreed with the minor
textual  changes made by Julie Hedlund to clarify the organization of
the  recommendations. They also asked Julie to insert a reference to the
BGC WG  Report to clarify the origin of the specific recommendations to
address any  question concerning the difference between the use of
"principles" versus  "operating procedures" in the text. In addition,
the Work Team members agreed  to change the word "shall" to "should"
throughout the recommendations, but to  insert a definition prior to the
recommendations section that "should" means  "mandatory" unless
otherwise specified. Finally, the Work Team members decided  to delete
Appendix A "Detailed Analysis of Group Operating Principles" since  many
of the recommendations in this section are inconsistent with those
agreed  to in the recommendations contained in the main body of the
document. The Work  Team noted that in the absence of a lengthy
discussion of the recommendations  in the "Detailed Analysis" section to
make them consistent with the  recommendations in the body of the
document the section should be deleted.  However, the Work Team noted
that Work Team members could include any of these  details, if desired,
in a Minority Report that would be attached as an  Appendix to the
document. During the meeting Claudio noted that there were  remaining
comments from Chuck and Rafik that had not been discussed. Julie  said
they had all been discussed, but noticed after the call that she was in
error. There are a couple of comments from Chuck in Section 2.3 that
need to  be discussed as follows: 1) 2.3.2 Storing and Updating
Membership Records,  paragraph c -- need a definition of an "inactive
member"; and 2) 2.3.2  paragraph d -- What is the meaning of the
sentence, "The Operator should  perform the updates to those holding an
executive position in an ICANN  Community." 
                        ACTIONS: Julie will make the requested changes
as redlines  -- DONE: See attached file; and 2) Work Team members are
requested to review  the revised document and provide comments and/or
minority reports no later  than 14 May.
                        
                        Task 2: The Work Team began a discussion of
comments received from Olga, Chuck, and Rafik on the framework document.
Michael asked whether the BGC WG Report provided details concerning
outreach  and Julie agreed to review the document. She also suggested
that Chuck and the  OSC could provide guidance. Michael added that it
would be useful, for  example, for the Work Team to recommend the
development of a guide to ICANN  for those unfamiliar with the
organization. Julie noted that the Policy Update  document as revised by
Scott Pinzon had been designed to be understood by  someone not familiar
with ICANN and GNSO Policy and she suggested that it  could be helpful
for Scott to join for a Work Team call to discuss current and  planned
activities that could assist with outreach efforts.
                        ACTIONS: 1)  Julie will invite Scott to the call
on 7 May (DONE -- he has agreed to join at  half past the hour); 2)
Michael will send an email to the list with his ideas  on specific
outreach tools; 3) Julie will review the BGC WG Report for  guidance on
outreach activities; and 4) Work Team members are requested to  provide
any additional comments on the framework document  (attached).