ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-osc-csg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION REQUESTED: Final Draft of Global Outreach Program Recommendations

  • To: Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>, Chuck Gomes <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION REQUESTED: Final Draft of Global Outreach Program Recommendations
  • From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 07:58:16 -0700

Dear Olga,

I will add Chuck’s changes to the document and finalize it.  I will send it to 
you and the Work Team later today.

Best regards,

Julie


On 9/8/10 10:48 AM, "Olga Cavalli" <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Dear Julie,
I suggest that we incorporate the text sent by Chuk (thanks Chuck for that!) 
and as we have recieved no other comments we should prepare the final version 
to be submitted to the OSC.
Best and many thanks
Olga

2010/9/5 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for answering my question Olga.  I suggest we change “There should be a 
specific financial sponsorship program to ensure a cost neutral exercise (i.e. 
sponsors would be allowed to post their marks on associated workshop materials 
for their financial support).”  to “There should be a specific financial 
sponsorship program to ensure a cost neutral exercise (i.e. sponsors would be 
allowed to have their logos displayed on associated workshop materials for 
their financial support). ”

Chuck


From: Olga Cavalli [mailto:olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2010 6:45 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: Julie Hedlund; gnso-osc-csg
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION REQUESTED: Final Draft of Global Outreach 
Program Recommendations


Thanks Chuck for your comments.
I am including my comments below but othrer members of the swt may comment as 
well.
Regards
Olga

2010/9/4 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

My compliments on all the work on this.  Sorry I was unable to make the call 
today.

Section 2.2.1 starts off with “The Committee should be responsible for 
developing various tutorial modules that could be inserted as workshops into 
existing regional meetings as well as conducted as online interactive workshops 
where these could be provided effectively.”  Is the thinking that the committee 
should/would actually develop the tutorial modules.  It seems to me that that 
would be a very time consuming task.  Would the committee really be able to do 
that?  I think it would be more realistic to ask the committee to facilitate or 
coordinate development.


In  my understanding the idea behind this is to develop multimedia materials 
that could be available before or after the workshop including some useful 
presentations that were done during it.
For example if there are introductory workshops, then a video can be made with 
the presentations in a shorter and more dynamic version in order to be shared 
among different communities. Also it is not very difficult to add captioning 
and it can be used in several languages.

Considering your comment we could change the language in the document like " 
Developing, coordinating or facilitating the creation of tutorial modules...."


In Section 2.2.2, the fourth sentence of the first paragraph says, “There 
should be a specific financial sponsorship program to ensure a cost neutral 
exercise (i.e. sponsors would be allowed to post their marks on associated 
workshop materials for their financial support).”  What does it mean “to post 
their marks”?


Post marks means that the logos of the sponsors can be added to the teaching 
materials, signs and other elements that are used in the training.
Please if you can suggest a better language to explain this idea in English.


Chuck


From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 4:14 PM
To: gnso-osc-csg
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION REQUESTED: Final Draft of Global Outreach 
Program Recommendations


Dear Work Team members,

Attached is a FINAL DRAFT of the recommendations for a global outreach program 
(Task 2).  During the Work Team call today we reviewed the 27 August document 
with comments from Krista, Chuck, and Michael.  We accepted most of the changes 
and also inserted some new ones.  The new changes are tracked in redline in the 
attached document for your review.

YOUR ACTION IS REQUESTED: Please send your comments on the final draft document 
to the list or, if you have specific edits, please include them as tracked 
edits and send them to me no later than  Close of Business on Wednesday 08 
September, so that I may incorporate them into a FINAL DOCUMENT to be sent by 
Olga to the OSC on Friday 10 September. The document also has been posted to 
the wiki page at: 
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team.

Thank you and please let me know if you have any questions.

Best regards,

Julie





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy