ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-osc-csg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION REQUESTED: Final Draft of Global Outreach Program Recommendations

  • To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION REQUESTED: Final Draft of Global Outreach Program Recommendations
  • From: Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 11:48:17 -0300

Dear Julie,
I suggest that we incorporate the text sent by Chuk (thanks Chuck for that!)
and as we have recieved no other comments we should prepare the final
version to be submitted to the OSC.
Best and many thanks
Olga

2010/9/5 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

>  Thanks for answering my question Olga.  I suggest we change “There should
> be a specific financial sponsorship program to ensure a cost neutral
> exercise (i.e. sponsors would be allowed to post their marks on associated
> workshop materials for their financial support).”  to “There should be a
> specific financial sponsorship program to ensure a cost neutral exercise
> (i.e. sponsors would be allowed to have their logos displayed on
> associated workshop materials for their financial support). ”
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* Olga Cavalli [mailto:olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent:* Saturday, September 04, 2010 6:45 PM
> *To:* Gomes, Chuck
> *Cc:* Julie Hedlund; gnso-osc-csg
> *Subject:* Re: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION REQUESTED: Final Draft of Global
> Outreach Program Recommendations
>
>
>
> Thanks Chuck for your comments.
> I am including my comments below but othrer members of the swt may comment
> as well.
> Regards
> Olga
>
> 2010/9/4 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> My compliments on all the work on this.  Sorry I was unable to make the
> call today.
>
>
>
> Section 2.2.1 starts off with “The Committee should be responsible for
> developing various tutorial modules that could be inserted as workshops into
> existing regional meetings as well as conducted as online interactive
> workshops where these could be provided effectively.”  Is the thinking
> that the committee should/would actually develop the tutorial modules.  It
> seems to me that that would be a very time consuming task.  Would the
> committee really be able to do that?  I think it would be more realistic to
> ask the committee to facilitate or coordinate development.
>
>
> In  my understanding the idea behind this is to develop multimedia
> materials that could be available before or after the workshop including
> some useful presentations that were done during it.
> For example if there are introductory workshops, then a video can be made
> with the presentations in a shorter and more dynamic version in order to be
> shared among different communities. Also it is not very difficult to add
> captioning and it can be used in several languages.
>
> Considering your comment we could change the language in the document like
> " Developing, coordinating or facilitating the creation of tutorial
> modules...."
>
>
>
> In Section 2.2.2, the fourth sentence of the first paragraph says, “There
> should be a specific financial sponsorship program to ensure a cost neutral
> exercise (i.e. sponsors would be allowed to post their marks on associated
> workshop materials for their financial support).”  What does it mean “to
> post their marks”?
>
>
> Post marks means that the logos of the sponsors can be added to the
> teaching materials, signs and other elements that are used in the training.
> Please if you can suggest a better language to explain this idea in
> English.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Julie Hedlund
> *Sent:* Friday, September 03, 2010 4:14 PM
> *To:* gnso-osc-csg
> *Subject:* [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION REQUESTED: Final Draft of Global Outreach
> Program Recommendations
>
>
>
> Dear Work Team members,
>
> Attached is a *FINAL DRAFT* of the recommendations for a global outreach
> program (Task 2).  During the Work Team call today we reviewed the 27 August
> document with comments from Krista, Chuck, and Michael.  We accepted most of
> the changes and also inserted some new ones.  The new changes are tracked in
> redline in the attached document for your review.
>
> *YOUR ACTION IS REQUESTED:* Please send your comments on the final draft
> document to the list or, if you have specific edits, please include them as
> tracked edits and send them to me no later than  *Close of Business on
> Wednesday 08 September,* *so that I may incorporate them into a FINAL
> DOCUMENT to be sent by Olga to the OSC on Friday 10 September. *The
> document also has been posted to the wiki page at:
> https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team.
>
> Thank you and please let me know if you have any questions.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Julie
>
>
>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy