Re: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION REQUESTED: Final Draft of Global Outreach Program Recommendations

[Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>]

thans Julie
regards
Olga

2010/9/8 Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>

>  Dear Olga,
>
> I will add Chuck’s changes to the document and finalize it.  I will send it
> to you and the Work Team later today.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Julie
>
>
>
> On 9/8/10 10:48 AM, "Olga Cavalli" <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Dear Julie,
> I suggest that we incorporate the text sent by Chuk (thanks Chuck for
> that!) and as we have recieved no other comments we should prepare the final
> version to be submitted to the OSC.
> Best and many thanks
> Olga
>
> 2010/9/5 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks for answering my question Olga.  I suggest we change “There should
> be a specific financial sponsorship program to ensure a cost neutral
> exercise (i.e. sponsors would be allowed to post their marks on associated
> workshop materials for their financial support).”  to “There should be a
> specific financial sponsorship program to ensure a cost neutral exercise
> (i.e. sponsors would be allowed to have their logos displayed on associated
> workshop materials for their financial support). ”
>
> Chuck
>
>
> *From:* Olga Cavalli [mailto:olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>]
>
> *Sent:* Saturday, September 04, 2010 6:45 PM
> *To:* Gomes, Chuck
> *Cc:* Julie Hedlund; gnso-osc-csg
> *Subject:* Re: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION REQUESTED: Final Draft of Global
> Outreach Program Recommendations
>
>
> Thanks Chuck for your comments.
> I am including my comments below but othrer members of the swt may comment
> as well.
> Regards
> Olga
>
> 2010/9/4 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> My compliments on all the work on this.  Sorry I was unable to make the
> call today.
>
> Section 2.2.1 starts off with “The Committee should be responsible for
> developing various tutorial modules that could be inserted as workshops into
> existing regional meetings as well as conducted as online interactive
> workshops where these could be provided effectively.”  Is the thinking that
> the committee should/would actually develop the tutorial modules.  It seems
> to me that that would be a very time consuming task.  Would the committee
> really be able to do that?  I think it would be more realistic to ask the
> committee to facilitate or coordinate development.
>
>
> In  my understanding the idea behind this is to develop multimedia
> materials that could be available before or after the workshop including
> some useful presentations that were done during it.
> For example if there are introductory workshops, then a video can be made
> with the presentations in a shorter and more dynamic version in order to be
> shared among different communities. Also it is not very difficult to add
> captioning and it can be used in several languages.
>
> Considering your comment we could change the language in the document like
> " Developing, coordinating or facilitating the creation of tutorial
> modules...."
>
>
>
> In Section 2.2.2, the fourth sentence of the first paragraph says, “There
> should be a specific financial sponsorship program to ensure a cost neutral
> exercise (i.e. sponsors would be allowed to post their marks on associated
> workshop materials for their financial support).”  What does it mean “to
> post their marks”?
>
>
>
> Post marks means that the logos of the sponsors can be added to the
> teaching materials, signs and other elements that are used in the training.
> Please if you can suggest a better language to explain this idea in
> English.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx<owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>]
> *On Behalf Of *Julie Hedlund
> *Sent:* Friday, September 03, 2010 4:14 PM
> *To:* gnso-osc-csg
> *Subject:* [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION REQUESTED: Final Draft of Global Outreach
> Program Recommendations
>
>
> Dear Work Team members,
>
> Attached is a *FINAL DRAFT* of the recommendations for a global outreach
> program (Task 2).  During the Work Team call today we reviewed the 27 August
> document with comments from Krista, Chuck, and Michael.  We accepted most of
> the changes and also inserted some new ones.  The new changes are tracked in
> redline in the attached document for your review.
>
> *YOUR ACTION IS REQUESTED:* Please send your comments on the final draft
> document to the list or, if you have specific edits, please include them as
> tracked edits and send them to me no later than  *Close of Business on
> Wednesday 08 September,* *so that I may incorporate them into a FINAL
> DOCUMENT to be sent by Olga to the OSC on Friday 10 September. *The
> document also has been posted to the wiki page at:
> https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team.
>
> Thank you and please let me know if you have any questions.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Julie
>
>
>
>
>
>