<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-osc-csg] FOR REVIEW: Revised Global OutreachRecommendations 03 Oct
- To: "olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx" <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] FOR REVIEW: Revised Global OutreachRecommendations 03 Oct
- From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 06:50:15 -0700
Olga,
I will send around the final version shortly in both redlined and clean
versions as you had requested earlier in the week.
Thanks,
Julie
On 10/15/10 7:17 AM, "Olga Cavalli" <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Rafik, perhaps Julie can send again te last version of the document.I
already read it some days ago with control changes.We do not have a call
today.BestOlga
Enviado desde mi BlackBerry de Movistar (http://www.movistar.com.ar)
From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:48:15 +0900
To: Olga Cavalli<olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Gomes, Chuck<cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Claudio Di Gangi<cdigangi@xxxxxxxx>;
OSC-CSG Work Team<gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] FOR REVIEW: Revised Global Outreach Recommendations
03 Oct
Hi Olga,
I think that we don't have the last version of the document including Claudio
and Chuck comments.
we don't have confcall today?
Regards
Rafik
2010/10/13 Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>
Thanks Chuck.
Regards
Olga
2010/10/12 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Olga,
I am okay with leaving 2.1.1 as Claudio changed it but was just flagging it to
see if others agree.
Chuck
From: Olga Cavalli [mailto:olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 12:23 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: Claudio Di Gangi; OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] FOR REVIEW: Revised Global Outreach Recommendations
03 Oct
Hi,
thanks Julie for polishing my comments and thanks Chuck and Claudio for your
imput into the document.
I am ok with both proposed changes.
Chuck in relation with your comment in your last email, do you want to leave
the paragraph 2.1.1 as it was?
I am not sure if I understand which is the language you support. Could you
clarify?
Other comments are welcome.
I propose that we set up next Friday as a limit for recieveing additional
comments or for the revision of the present version.
I will take silence as a yes if nobody else sends them. New version could be
sent to the OSC by next Monday.
Best regards
Olga
2010/10/11 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
I am okay with Claudio’s additional edits but we might want to discuss the
following further:
• The last paragraph of 2.1.1 now reads: “An initial objective of the
OTF should be to conduct a survey of existing GNSO outreach activities by the
stakeholder groups, constituencies, and ICANN, including the Fellowship
program. The OTF could then analyze the effectiveness and balance of existing
efforts and resources to develop recommendations for improved future Outreach.
Where possible, ICANN Outreach can take place in conjunction with other related
ICANN Programs, such as Compliance or those related to the new introduction of
new top-level domain names.” It previously was more specific as can be seen by
looking at the redline version. I personally think the change is okay.
Chuck
From: Claudio Di Gangi [mailto:cdigangi@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 8:51 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Olga Cavalli; OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] FOR REVIEW: Revised Global Outreach Recommendations
03 Oct
Team,
I included some further red-line edits in the attached, building from the
changes Chuck suggests below, which I support.
claudio
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 8:44 PM
To: Olga Cavalli; OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] FOR REVIEW: Revised Global Outreach Recommendations
03 Oct
I made the following edits in the attached file and noted items that I couldn’t
figure out how to fix:
2.1 Recommendations for a Global Outreach Strategy
• I inserted “to” that was inadvertently deleted in the first sentence
of the last paragraph that starts on page 3 and in the same sentence changed
“large companies” to “companies”.
2.1.1 Purpose, Mission, Principles, and Initiate Objective of the Outreach Task
Force
• I changed “Intitiate” to “Initial” in the above title.
• The last paragraph starting on page 4 is very confusing: “The OSC CSG
Work Team recommends that the mission of the OTF should include coordinating
outreach with relevant ICANN organizations and could incorporate
recommendations from the OSC CSG Work Team’s report Recommended Common
Operating Principles and Participation Guidelines for GNSO Stakeholder Groups
and Constituencies; and Recommendations on a GNSO Database of Community Members
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-csg-recommendations-task-27may10-en.pdf>
when establishing other specifics regarding the structure of the OTF, voting
thresholds, publicity, events, and other activities.” Is the semi-colon a
typo; should it be deleted? I think this whole paragraph needs fixing.
• I made what I think are minor edits to item 1 near the top of page 5:
“Outreach to potential participants in the Commercial Stakeholder Group is
different from outreach to potential participants in the Non-Commercial
Stakeholder Group”
2.1.2 Membership of the Outreach Task Force
• I deleted the following in the first paragraph: “Staff support could
be minimal.” I don’t think we know if this will be true or not.
• Also in the first paragraph I deleted the size of the MAG (“50”)
because I don’t think we want to imply that the OTF should be that big.
• In the last paragraph I made the change shown here: “The Charter
should also set goals for the completion of the membership selection process,
establishment of a meeting schedule, and participation guidelines.”
2.1.3 Identifying Potential Participants and Target Populations
• I changed the 3rd paragraph to the following: “The telecommunications
youth forums at the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) are an example
of successful outreach programs that could be used to inform and support the
OTF’s efforts. See:
http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/youth/itu__telecom_youth_forums.html
<http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/youth/itu__telecom_youth_forums.html> .”
Chuck
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Olga Cavalli
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 12:35 PM
To: OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: Fwd: [gnso-osc-csg] FOR REVIEW: Revised Global Outreach
Recommendations 03 Oct
Dear working team members,
please remember to review the attached document and make comments or suggested
changes to this version that was edited by me and Julie.
If we hear no comments we may submit it to the osc by next Monday.
Comments are welcome, best regards and thanks.
Olga
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2010/10/4
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] FOR REVIEW: Revised Global Outreach Recommendations 03
Oct
To: gnso-osc-csg <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
Dear Olga and Work Team members,
Attached is the revised Global Outreach Recommendations document based on our
discussion at the Work Team meeting last Friday in response to comments
received by the OSC and responses from Work Team members. These include edits
from Olga and some additions that I made based on our discussion. Please
review this document and provide your suggested changes as tracked changes in
the document or as comments to this list. Thank you for your assistance.
Best regards,
Julie
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|