Re: [gnso-osc-csg] FOR REVIEW: Revised Global OutreachRecommendations 03 Oct

["Olga Cavalli" <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Rafik, perhaps Julie can send again te last version of the document.
I already read it some days ago with control changes.
We do not have a call today.
Best
Olga

Enviado desde mi BlackBerry de Movistar (http://www.movistar.com.ar) 

-----Original Message-----
From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:48:15 
To: Olga Cavalli<olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Gomes, Chuck<cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Claudio Di Gangi<cdigangi@xxxxxxxx>; 
OSC-CSG Work Team<gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] FOR REVIEW: Revised Global Outreach
 Recommendations 03 Oct

Hi Olga,

I think that we don't have the last version of the document including
Claudio and Chuck comments.
we don't have confcall today?

Regards

Rafik

2010/10/13 Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>

> Thanks Chuck.
> Regards
> Olga
>
> 2010/10/12 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>  Olga,
>>
>>
>>
>> I am okay with leaving 2.1.1 as Claudio changed it but was just flagging
>> it to see if others agree.
>>
>>
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Olga Cavalli [mailto:olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx]
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 12, 2010 12:23 PM
>> *To:* Gomes, Chuck
>> *Cc:* Claudio Di Gangi; OSC-CSG Work Team
>> *Subject:* Re: [gnso-osc-csg] FOR REVIEW: Revised Global Outreach
>> Recommendations 03 Oct
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>> thanks Julie for polishing my comments and thanks Chuck and Claudio for
>> your imput into the document.
>> I am ok with both proposed changes.
>> Chuck in relation with your comment in your last email, do you want to
>> leave the paragraph 2.1.1 as it was?
>> I am not sure if I understand which is the language you support. Could you
>> clarify?
>> Other comments are welcome.
>> I propose that we set up next Friday as a limit for recieveing additional
>> comments or for the revision of the present version.
>> I will take silence as a yes if nobody else sends them. New version could
>> be sent to the OSC by next Monday.
>> Best regards
>> Olga
>>
>> 2010/10/11 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>  I am okay with Claudio’s additional edits but we might want to discuss
>> the following further:
>>
>>
>>
>> ·         The last paragraph of 2.1.1 now reads: “An initial objective of
>> the OTF should be to conduct a survey of existing GNSO outreach activities
>> by the stakeholder groups, constituencies, and ICANN, including the
>> Fellowship program. The OTF could then analyze the effectiveness and balance
>> of existing efforts and resources to develop recommendations for improved
>> future Outreach. Where possible, ICANN Outreach can take place in
>> conjunction with other related ICANN Programs, such as Compliance or those
>> related to the new introduction of new top-level domain names.”  It
>> previously was more specific as can be seen by looking at the redline
>> version.  I personally think the change is okay.
>>
>>
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Claudio Di Gangi [mailto:cdigangi@xxxxxxxx]
>> *Sent:* Sunday, October 10, 2010 8:51 PM
>> *To:* Gomes, Chuck; Olga Cavalli; OSC-CSG Work Team
>>
>>
>> *Subject:* RE: [gnso-osc-csg] FOR REVIEW: Revised Global Outreach
>> Recommendations 03 Oct
>>
>>
>>
>> Team,
>>
>>
>>
>> I included some further red-line edits in the attached, building from the
>> changes Chuck suggests below, which I support.
>>
>>
>>
>> claudio
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx]
>> *On Behalf Of *Gomes, Chuck
>> *Sent:* Friday, October 08, 2010 8:44 PM
>> *To:* Olga Cavalli; OSC-CSG Work Team
>> *Subject:* RE: [gnso-osc-csg] FOR REVIEW: Revised Global Outreach
>> Recommendations 03 Oct
>>
>>
>>
>> I made the following edits in the attached file and noted items that I
>> couldn’t figure out how to fix:
>>
>>
>>
>> *2.1 Recommendations for a Global Outreach Strategy*
>>
>> ·         I inserted “to” that was inadvertently deleted in the first
>> sentence of the last paragraph that starts on page 3 and in the same
>> sentence changed “large companies” to “companies”.
>>
>>
>>
>> *2.1.1 Purpose, Mission, Principles, and Initiate Objective of the
>> Outreach Task Force*
>>
>> ·         I changed “Intitiate” to “Initial” in the above title.
>>
>> ·         The last paragraph starting on page 4 is very confusing: “The
>> OSC CSG Work Team recommends that the mission of the OTF should include
>> coordinating outreach with relevant ICANN organizations and could
>> incorporate recommendations from the OSC CSG Work Team’s report Recommended
>> Common Operating Principles and Participation Guidelines for GNSO
>> Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies; and Recommendations on a GNSO
>> Database of Community 
>> Members<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-csg-recommendations-task-27may10-en.pdf>when
>>  establishing other specifics regarding the structure of the OTF, voting
>> thresholds, publicity, events, and other activities.”  Is the semi-colon
>> a typo; should it be deleted?  I think this whole paragraph needs fixing.
>>
>> ·         I made what I think are minor edits to item 1 near the top of
>> page 5: “Outreach to potential participants in the Commercial Stakeholder
>> Group is different from outreach to potential participants in the
>> Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group”
>>
>>
>>
>> *2.1.2 Membership of the Outreach Task Force*
>>
>> ·         I deleted the following in the first paragraph: “Staff support
>> could be minimal.”  I don’t think we know if this will be true or not.
>>
>> ·         Also in the first paragraph I deleted the size of the MAG
>> (“50”) because I don’t think we want to imply that the OTF should be that
>> big.
>>
>> ·         In the last paragraph I made the change shown here: “The
>> Charter should also set goals for the completion of the membership
>> selection process, establishment of a meeting schedule, and participation
>> guidelines.”
>>
>>
>>
>> *2.1.3 Identifying Potential Participants and Target Populations*
>>
>> ·         I changed the 3rd paragraph to the following: “The
>> telecommunications youth forums at the International Telecommunications
>> Union (ITU) are an example of successful outreach programs that could be
>> used to inform and support the OTF’s efforts.  See:
>> http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/youth/itu__telecom_youth_forums.html.”;
>>
>>
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx]
>> *On Behalf Of *Olga Cavalli
>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 07, 2010 12:35 PM
>> *To:* OSC-CSG Work Team
>> *Subject:* Fwd: [gnso-osc-csg] FOR REVIEW: Revised Global Outreach
>> Recommendations 03 Oct
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear working team members,
>> please remember to review the attached document and make comments or
>> suggested changes to this version that was edited by me and Julie.
>> If we hear no comments we may submit it to the osc by next Monday.
>> Comments are welcome, best regards and thanks.
>> Olga
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: *Julie Hedlund* <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: 2010/10/4
>> Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] FOR REVIEW: Revised Global Outreach
>> Recommendations 03 Oct
>> To: gnso-osc-csg <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Dear Olga and Work Team members,
>>
>> Attached is the revised Global Outreach Recommendations document based on
>> our discussion at the Work Team meeting last Friday in response to comments
>> received by the OSC and responses from Work Team members.  These include
>> edits from Olga and some additions that I made based on our discussion.
>>  Please review this document and provide your suggested changes as tracked
>> changes in the document or as comments to this list.  Thank you for your
>> assistance.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Julie
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>