ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-osc-csg] FOR REVIEW: Revised Global Outreach Recommendations 03 Oct

  • To: "Olga Cavalli" <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] FOR REVIEW: Revised Global Outreach Recommendations 03 Oct
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:02:13 -0400



I am okay with leaving 2.1.1 as Claudio changed it but was just flagging
it to see if others agree.




From: Olga Cavalli [mailto:olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 12:23 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: Claudio Di Gangi; OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] FOR REVIEW: Revised Global Outreach
Recommendations 03 Oct


thanks Julie for polishing my comments and thanks Chuck and Claudio for
your imput into the document.
I am ok with both proposed changes.
Chuck in relation with your comment in your last email, do you want to
leave the paragraph 2.1.1 as it was?
I am not sure if I understand which is the language you support. Could
you clarify?
Other comments are welcome.
I propose that we set up next Friday as a limit for recieveing
additional comments or for the revision of the present version.
I will take silence as a yes if nobody else sends them. New version
could be sent to the OSC by next Monday.
Best regards

2010/10/11 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

 I am okay with Claudio's additional edits but we might want to discuss
the following further:


*         The last paragraph of 2.1.1 now reads: "An initial objective
of the OTF should be to conduct a survey of existing GNSO outreach
activities by the stakeholder groups, constituencies, and ICANN,
including the Fellowship program. The OTF could then analyze the
effectiveness and balance of existing efforts and resources to develop
recommendations for improved future Outreach. Where possible, ICANN
Outreach can take place in conjunction with other related ICANN
Programs, such as Compliance or those related to the new introduction of
new top-level domain names."  It previously was more specific as can be
seen by looking at the redline version.  I personally think the change
is okay.




From: Claudio Di Gangi [mailto:cdigangi@xxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 8:51 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Olga Cavalli; OSC-CSG Work Team

Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] FOR REVIEW: Revised Global Outreach
Recommendations 03 Oct




I included some further red-line edits in the attached, building from
the changes Chuck suggests below, which I support.




From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 8:44 PM
To: Olga Cavalli; OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] FOR REVIEW: Revised Global Outreach
Recommendations 03 Oct


I made the following edits in the attached file and noted items that I
couldn't figure out how to fix:


2.1 Recommendations for a Global Outreach Strategy

*         I inserted "to" that was inadvertently deleted in the first
sentence of the last paragraph that starts on page 3 and in the same
sentence changed "large companies" to "companies".


2.1.1 Purpose, Mission, Principles, and Initiate Objective of the
Outreach Task Force

*         I changed "Intitiate" to "Initial" in the above title.

*         The last paragraph starting on page 4 is very confusing: "The
OSC CSG Work Team recommends that the mission of the OTF should include
coordinating outreach with relevant ICANN organizations and could
incorporate recommendations from the OSC CSG Work Team's report
Recommended Common Operating Principles and Participation Guidelines for
GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies; and Recommendations on a
GNSO Database of Community Members
pdf>  when establishing other specifics regarding the structure of the
OTF, voting thresholds, publicity, events, and other activities."  Is
the semi-colon a typo; should it be deleted?  I think this whole
paragraph needs fixing.

*         I made what I think are minor edits to item 1 near the top of
page 5: "Outreach to potential participants in the Commercial
Stakeholder Group is different from outreach to potential participants
in the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group"


2.1.2 Membership of the Outreach Task Force

*         I deleted the following in the first paragraph: "Staff support
could be minimal."  I don't think we know if this will be true or not.

*         Also in the first paragraph I deleted the size of the MAG
("50") because I don't think we want to imply that the OTF should be
that big.

*         In the last paragraph I made the change shown here: "The
Charter should also set goals for the completion of the membership
selection process, establishment of a meeting schedule, and
participation guidelines."


2.1.3 Identifying Potential Participants and Target Populations

*         I changed the 3rd paragraph to the following: "The
telecommunications youth forums at the International Telecommunications
Union (ITU) are an example of successful outreach programs that could be
used to inform and support the OTF's efforts.  See:
<http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/youth/itu__telecom_youth_forums.html> ."








From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Olga Cavalli
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 12:35 PM
To: OSC-CSG Work Team
Subject: Fwd: [gnso-osc-csg] FOR REVIEW: Revised Global Outreach
Recommendations 03 Oct


Dear working team members,
please remember to review the attached document and make comments or
suggested changes to this version that was edited by me and Julie.
If we hear no comments we may submit it to the osc by next Monday.
Comments are welcome, best regards and thanks.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2010/10/4
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] FOR REVIEW: Revised Global Outreach
Recommendations 03 Oct
To: gnso-osc-csg <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>

Dear Olga and Work Team members,

Attached is the revised Global Outreach Recommendations document based
on our discussion at the Work Team meeting last Friday in response to
comments received by the OSC and responses from Work Team members.
These include edits from Olga and some additions that I made based on
our discussion.  Please review this document and provide your suggested
changes as tracked changes in the document or as comments to this list.
Thank you for your assistance.

Best regards,




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy