<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-osc-ops] RE: Council Rules of Procedures (RoP)
- To: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>, <ray@xxxxxxxxx>, <ntfy-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-osc-ops] RE: Council Rules of Procedures (RoP)
- From: "Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 03:16:28 -0400
I support this revised motion.
RA
Ronald N. Andruff
RNA Partners, Inc.
220 Fifth Avenue, 20th floor
New York, New York 10001
www.rnapartners.com
V: +1 212 481 2820 x 11
F: +1 212 481 2859
_____
From: owner-ntfy-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-ntfy-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 2009-10-27 03:04
To: ray@xxxxxxxxx; ntfy-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Council Rules of Procedures (RoP)
Ray:
from the discussion within the CSG it turned out that there are still
questions open with regard how abstentions should be counted in the voting
process. The council (through the working team) is requested to review this
point and come back with a revised proposal after a fixed short period of
time. The related current draft motion would be approved with keeping the
existing text as status quo until the revised text is been accepted.
My intention for tomorrows council meeting is to come up with the revised
motion as attached.
Please feed back
- whether this is acceptable
- with setting a date where this point could e resolved
Thanks
Wolf-Ulrich
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|