<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-osc-ops] AW: Council Rules of Procedures (RoP)
- To: <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ray@xxxxxxxxx>, <ntfy-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-osc-ops] AW: Council Rules of Procedures (RoP)
- From: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:21:29 +0100
Thanks Ron
Wolf-Ulrich
________________________________
Von: Ron Andruff [mailto:randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2009 08:16
An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich; ray@xxxxxxxxx; ntfy-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx;
gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx
Betreff: RE: Council Rules of Procedures (RoP)
I support this revised motion.
RA
Ronald N. Andruff
RNA Partners, Inc.
220 Fifth Avenue, 20th floor
New York, New York 10001
www.rnapartners.com
V: +1 212 481 2820 x 11
F: +1 212 481 2859
________________________________
From: owner-ntfy-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-ntfy-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 2009-10-27 03:04
To: ray@xxxxxxxxx; ntfy-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Council Rules of Procedures (RoP)
Ray:
from the discussion within the CSG it turned out that there are still
questions open with regard how abstentions should be counted in the
voting process. The council (through the working team) is requested to
review this point and come back with a revised proposal after a fixed
short period of time. The related current draft motion would be approved
with keeping the existing text as status quo until the revised text is
been accepted.
My intention for tomorrows council meeting is to come up with the
revised motion as attached.
Please feed back
- whether this is acceptable
- with setting a date where this point could e resolved
Thanks
Wolf-Ulrich
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|