<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-osc-ops] Re: [] SOI/DOI and PPSC WG WT
- To: gnso-osc-ops <gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-osc-ops] Re: [] SOI/DOI and PPSC WG WT
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:12:40 -0400
Sorry erroneous subject line.
a.
On 13 Oct 2010, at 17:06, Avri Doria wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I did as was discussed in our previous meeting and reported on this group's
> continuing efforts with SOI/DOI to the PPSC Working Group WT. I covered all
> 3 of the issues: Written DOIs, Individual polling for SOI/DOI and Staff
> SOI/DOI.
>
> As they had taken a decision to include the work of this group in their
> report, they indicated that they will wait for this group to finish and then
> review during the comment period.
>
> I recommend that when have completed the rewording, we send a courtesy
> notifications w/text to the PPSC Working Group Working Team for their review
> and comment. I do not think we need to wait for the OSC to approach the PPSC
> for this. As a member of both groups, I can serve as a carrier for that
> effort if the group wishes.
>
> The WG WT has just finished doing its comment review and is nearly ready to
> send their doc for final approval. They are going to annotate the dependency
> of the SOI./DOI in the guidelines on this group's work.
>
> I should also mention that there was definite interest in the subject of
> Staff SOI/DOI. One issue that was brought up in our brief discussion was the
> hypothetical of a Staff member who owned stock in a relevant corporation -
> i.e. how did we intend to handle that.
>
> So, how do we intend to handle that?
>
> cheers,
>
> a.
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|