<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-osc-ops] SOI/DOI and OSC
- To: "'gnso-osc-ops'" <gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-ops] SOI/DOI and OSC
- From: "Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:18:42 -0400
All good news, Avri. WRT staff owning stock in a company, if it is deminimus
(that spelling looks funky!) then I submit it is already addressed in the
current SOI language, but we could certainly toss this back to staff to
consider in light of our requests for new language from today. If it is
significant stock ownership, then SOI would be called into play.
My 2 cents...
RA
Ronald N. Andruff
President
RNA Partners, Inc.
220 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10001
+ 1 212 481 2820 ext. 11
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-ops@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 5:06 PM
To: gnso-osc-ops
Subject: [gnso-osc-ops] SOI/DOI and OSC
Hi,
I did as was discussed in our previous meeting and reported on this group's
continuing efforts with SOI/DOI to the PPSC Working Group WT. I covered all
3 of the issues: Written DOIs, Individual polling for SOI/DOI and Staff
SOI/DOI.
As they had taken a decision to include the work of this group in their
report, they indicated that they will wait for this group to finish and then
review during the comment period.
I recommend that when have completed the rewording, we send a courtesy
notifications w/text to the PPSC Working Group Working Team for their review
and comment. I do not think we need to wait for the OSC to approach the
PPSC for this. As a member of both groups, I can serve as a carrier for
that effort if the group wishes.
The WG WT has just finished doing its comment review and is nearly ready to
send their doc for final approval. They are going to annotate the
dependency of the SOI./DOI in the guidelines on this group's work.
I should also mention that there was definite interest in the subject of
Staff SOI/DOI. One issue that was brought up in our brief discussion was
the hypothetical of a Staff member who owned stock in a relevant corporation
- i.e. how did we intend to handle that.
So, how do we intend to handle that?
cheers,
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|