RE: [gnso-osc] Another Attempt at a Final Response to the CCT

["Vanda UOL" <vanda@xxxxxxxxxx>]

For me, both, explicitly have tolerance included or just rely on the
Ombudsman office will work. The most important thing is really improve the
level of civility in writing/F2F or telephone communication or we will face
a drop of participation in ICANN challenging our capacity to accomplish AoC.

Best

 

cid:image002.jpg@01C93E96.B7BF8BD0

Vanda Scartezini

Polo Consultores Associados

Alameda Santos 1470 #1407

Tel - +55.11.3266.6253

Mob- +55.11.8181.1464

vanda@xxxxxxxxxx

 

 

 

From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Ken Bour
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2009 3:57 PM
To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'Scott Pinzon'
Subject: [gnso-osc] Another Attempt at a Final Response to the CCT

 

OSC Members:

 

In the interest of continuing to make progress on the CCT letter, I
reinserted paragraph 4(a) and, following Chuck's original suggestion, noted
that the OSC is not unanimous on this recommendation (see below).  All other
edits were accepted and comments removed (clean version attached).

 

For ease of reference, my suggested modification to 4(a) follows... is this
language be acceptable to everyone?

a)      Executive Summary Recommendations (last bullet point) and 2.5.7
Degradation in Civility 

Recommendation:  "Encourage the understanding of opposing perspectives,
while maintaining a spirit of cooperation and civility" 

Comment:  Civility is clearly called for in ICANN's Expected
<http://www.icann.org/en/transparency/acct-trans-frameworks-principles-10jan
08.pdf>  Standards of Behavior (see Section F); however, as the organization
begins to incorporate more diverse cultures, some members of the OSC believe
that increasing our tolerance of others is also important.  Would the CCT
consider a modification to the recommendation, such as, ".maintaining a
spirit of cooperation, civility and tolerance"?  Note: The OSC is not
unanimous on this recommendation.  While some members would like to see
"tolerance" added explicitly, others believe that the ICANN code
satisfactorily embraces this concept (e.g. third bullet beginning with
TREAT) and that the GNSO should adopt the standards as written or seek to
have them amended officially by working through the ICANN Ombudsman office. 

 

Ken Bour

 

From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 9:16 AM
To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: FW: [gnso-osc] Final response to the CCT

 

Chuck, yes indeed  apologies.

It should read:

Robin,
I do not understand your comment that the Ombudsman principles fail to
address tolerance.
See below especially paragraphs I've highlighted in blue (bullet 3,4, 5 and
6).Isn't bullet 3 a definition of tolerance?

 

  _____  

From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 3:08 PM
To: Philip Sheppard; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] Final response to the CCT

Philip,

 

Did you man bullet 3?

 

Chuck

 

  _____  

From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 4:07 AM
To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] Final response to the CCT

Robin,
I do not understand your comment that the Ombudsman principles fail to
address tolerance.
See below especially paragraphs I've highlighted in blue (bullet 4,5, 6 and
7).Isn't bullet 4 a definition of tolerance?

http://www.icann.org/en/transparency/acct-trans-frameworks-principles-10jan0
8.pdf
Philip
-----------------------
F. ICANN EXPECTED STANDARDS OF BEHAVIOR
Those who take part in ICANN multi-stakeholder process including Board,
staff and all those involved
in Supporting Organization and Advisory Committee councils undertake to:
. Act in accordance with ICANN's Bylaws. In particular, participants
undertake to act within the
mission of ICANN and in the spirit of the values contained in the Bylaws.
. Adhere to the conflict of interest policy laid out in the Bylaws.
. Treat all members of the ICANN community equally, irrespective of
nationality, gender, racial
or ethnic origin, religion or beliefs, disability, age, or sexual
orientation; members of the ICANN
community should treat each other with civility both face to face and
online.
. Act in a reasonable and informed manner when participating in policy
development and
decision-making processes. This includes regularly attending all scheduled
meetings and
exercising independent judgment based solely on what is in the overall best
interest of Internet
users and the stability and security of the Internet's system of unique
identifiers, irrespective of
personal interests and the interests of the entity to which an individual
might owe their
appointment.
. Listen to the views of all stakeholders when considering policy issues.
ICANN is a unique
multi-stakeholder environment. Those who take part in the ICANN process must
acknowledge
the importance of all stakeholders and seek to understand their points of
view.
. Work to build consensus with other stakeholders in order to find solutions
to the issues that
fall within the areas of ICANN's responsibility. The ICANN model is based on
a bottom-up,
consensus driven approach to policy development. Those who take part in the
ICANN process
must take responsibility for ensuring the success of the model by trying to
build consensus with
other participants.
. Act in accordance with ICANN policies.
. Protect the organization's assets and ensure their efficient and effective
use.
. Act fairly and in good faith with other participants in the ICANN process.