<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-osc] CCT Report II
- To: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, <gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] CCT Report II
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:39:35 -0400
I would add that if any sort of behavior becomes disruptive to the
group, we have procedures for dealing with that.
Chuck
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 9:31 AM
To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-osc] CCT Report II
Mason,
wrt Report II section 4.9
I too struggle to understand the basis of the objection to
section 4.9 as Ive not yet heard an advocate for the right to be
unpleasant. However, may I suggest a simple compromise.
-----------------------
DELETE
As reflected in the following ICANN Board Resolutions, the CCT
encourages ICANN, Staff, and the GNSO to remind participants frequently
of its standards for behavior:
ADD
This issue has been fully addressed by the Board:
--------------------------
Philip
OSC Chair
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|