<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-osc] OSC review - GNSO procedures - section 5 statements of interest
- To: "'Metalitz, Steven'" <met@xxxxxxx>, "'Philip Sheppard'" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, <gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] OSC review - GNSO procedures - section 5 statements of interest
- From: "Ray Fassett" <ray@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 15:31:15 -0400
Steve, I am backtracking a little on this issue.will follow up. Thanks for
pointing it out. As of now, I think it was discussed but backtracking to
see why the most recent version remained silent to it, including whether or
not an inadvertent omission.not saying this was the case, just backtracking
to see and will let you know what I find.
Ray
_____
From: Metalitz, Steven [mailto:met@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 11:01 AM
To: Philip Sheppard; gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Ray Fassett
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] OSC review - GNSO procedures - section 5 statements
of interest
Unless I have missed it, the revised section 5 document now under OSC review
does not reflect the point raised below, which I believe a number of OSC
members supported. Ray, was there a reason for the omission?
I am also curious about the team's view on the relevance of "declared
country of residence, which may be the country to which you pay taxes," to
the SOI/DOI process. Why was this added to the SOI form?
Steve
_____
From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 3:43 AM
To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'Ray Fassett'
Subject: [gnso-osc] OSC review - GNSO procedures - section 5 statements of
interest
Indeed I support Steve's additional thought re a list of contractors.
Ray, please add to your revised section 5.
Philip
--------------------------
A related issue to consider: if this system is to work as proposed, there
needs to be an authoritative, current and publicly available list of all
"entities with which ICANN has a transaction, contract, or other arrangement
(e.g. Registries, Registrars, Consultants,etc)." Otherwise, a person who
has a "compensation arrangement" with such an entity on an issue totally
unrelated to ICANN might well be unaware that this is a relationship which
s/he is supposed to disclose. I don't think such a list exists today, is
ICANN in a position to prepare, maintain and post it?
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|