RE: [gnso-osc] OSC review - GNSO procedures - section 5 statements of interest

["Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx>]

Unless I have missed it, the revised section 5 document now under OSC
review does not reflect the point raised below, which I believe a number
of OSC members supported.  Ray, was there a reason for the omission? 
 
I am also curious about the team's view on the relevance of "declared
country of residence, which may be the country to which you pay taxes,"
to the SOI/DOI process.  Why was this added to the SOI form?  
 
Steve  

________________________________

From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 3:43 AM
To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'Ray Fassett'
Subject: [gnso-osc] OSC review - GNSO procedures - section 5 statements
of interest


Indeed I support Steve's additional thought re a list of contractors.
Ray, please add to your revised section 5.
Philip
--------------------------
A related issue to consider:  if this system is to work as proposed,
there needs to be an authoritative, current and publicly available list
of all "entities with which ICANN has a transaction, contract, or other
arrangement (e.g. Registries, Registrars, Consultants,etc)."  Otherwise,
a person who has a "compensation arrangement" with such an entity on an
issue totally unrelated to ICANN might well be unaware that this is a
relationship which s/he is supposed to disclose.   I don't think such a
list exists today, is ICANN in a position to prepare, maintain and post
it?