<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-osc] OSC approval of amended Council procedures - 5.10 statements of interest - deadline 21 January 2011
- To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [gnso-osc] OSC approval of amended Council procedures - 5.10 statements of interest - deadline 21 January 2011
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:53:32 -0500
Hi,
I have added some comments and questions to Chuck's edits.
for ease of reference:
5.2.3 I think we may need to differentiate full time employees from those who
may be employees and not contractors, but who may have other employers as well.
This may be a moot point if there are not part time employees, but there could
be part timers.
I thought we were speaking of fulltime employees when we discussed this in
Cartagena.
5.3.3 (2) I pay taxes in two countries. How do I handle this? Would I have
to list both? Is that the intent?
5.3.3 (4) Re: de minimus: Is this a global term ? Does it need to be defined
somewhere?
5.3.3 (5)
a. what does it mean to be a representative? If someone is reporting
information to someone (even for pay), but totally independent in terms of
actions taken in the group, are they a representative?
b. Is it permitted to represent someone who wishes to remain unnamed?
5.3.3. (6i) Does material interest have a global known definition? Do we need
to define this somewhere.
also in Cartagena, I thought there had not been agreement to completely remove
disclosure of interest. I though we had some sort of notion that there was a
need for group participants to verbally indicate if an specific topic during a
meeting brought up some specific issue of interest that was not immediately
obvious from the SoI. I thought this mean there needed to be some paragraph
indicating that there was an obligation if during a discussions some disclosure
became necessary, it should be made at that point in time.
thanks
a.
On 12 Jan 2011, at 04:01, Philip Sheppard wrote:
> I find all of Chuck's suggested small edits and suggestions to be helpful
> clarification to the intent of the group in Cartagena.
> Please treat the version with Chuck's edits as the document for approval.
>
> Philip
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|