<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-osc] OSC approval of amended Council procedures - 5.10 statements of interest v4 - deadline 28 January 2011
- To: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, <gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] OSC approval of amended Council procedures - 5.10 statements of interest v4 - deadline 28 January 2011
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:40:35 -0500
I agree that one SOI makes the most sense. It would then just be
incumbent on each person to keep their SOI updated for every group in
which they participate. When they join a new group, it could mean that
an SOI might need to be updated if there are new issues of interests
related to that group that were not addressed in the existing SOI.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 3:51 AM
> To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-osc] OSC approval of amended Council procedures -
> 5.10 statements of interest v4 - deadline 28 January 2011
>
>
>
> Avri,
> you raise a good point about one or more SOIs.
> From a practical point of view one SOI makes sense.
> It must be up to the author to ensure the SOI content is comprehensive
> of all
> groups in which they participate.
>
> ICANN staff will have to ensure a means of SOI referencing which
> accommodates
> this.
> That does not seem to be too problematic a task but a task
> nevertheless.
>
> Any comment from staff most welcome !!
>
> Philip
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|