RE: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - approval by April 15 - v3
Seems like a reasonable idea to me. Chuck > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Avri Doria > Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 12:43 PM > To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - approval > by April 15 - v3 > > > Originally sent from wrong address. > > > On 6 Apr 2011, at 04:34, Philip Sheppard wrote: > > > <proxy votes v3.doc> > > > I am fine with the changes, but have one recommendation: > > re: > > > > > > ii. A Councilor is expected to vote on such motions as may come > before the GNSO Council using the means provided in Section 4.4 > (Absentee Voting). If the vote is outside of the scope of 4.4.1 then > the Councilor may opt for Section 4.6 (Proxy Voting). > > > > > > The 4.4.1 remedy is time limited. It is possible that someone's > absence, whether planned (trip to the arctic) or unplanned (severe > accident) is longer than the 4.4.1 timing, then they may not be able to > use absentee voting. Would it be ok to add, "Whenever possible" at the > beginning of the condition? > > I think this also means that the form would need to be changed to > include both an option for 4.4.1 vote and all other votes. > > thanks > > a.