RE: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - approval by April 15 - v3

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Seems like a reasonable idea to me.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 12:43 PM
> To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote -
approval
> by April 15 - v3
> 
> 
> Originally sent from wrong address.
> 
> 
> On 6 Apr 2011, at 04:34, Philip Sheppard wrote:
> 
> > <proxy votes v3.doc>
> 
> 
> I am fine with the changes, but have one recommendation:
> 
> re:
> >
> >
> > ii. A Councilor is expected to vote on such motions as may come
> before the GNSO Council using the means provided in Section 4.4
> (Absentee Voting). If the vote is outside of the scope of 4.4.1 then
> the Councilor may opt for Section 4.6 (Proxy Voting).
> >
> >
> 
> The 4.4.1 remedy is time limited.  It is possible that someone's
> absence, whether planned (trip to the arctic) or unplanned (severe
> accident) is longer than the 4.4.1 timing, then they may not be able
to
> use absentee voting.  Would it be ok to add, "Whenever possible" at
the
> beginning of the condition?
> 
> I think this also means that the form would need to be changed to
> include both an option for 4.4.1 vote and all other votes.
> 
> thanks
> 
> a.