RE: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - approval by April 15 - v3

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

This looks pretty good to me.  I am also okay with Avri's suggested
change.  And I look for a response from Ken and/or Rob.

 

Chuck

 

From: owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 5:35 AM
To: gnso-osc@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-osc] GNSO Council procedures - proxy vote - approval by
April 15 - v3

 

Thanks for all the useful debate.

In light of this I propose a revision of the earlier simplification.

 

This:

- adds even more to simplification (Avri, Chuck et al)

- makes it clear that attendance is preferred (Ray)

- removes no existing rights (Stephane)

- allows for equivalent flexibility for any proxy giving Councilor
(Chuck)

- removes the objection to the legal basis for the proxy giver providing
voting direction (Ken).

- removes the odd absence/abstention confusion (Philip, Chuck, Avri).

 

Thoughts on the attached v3 ?

Ken, Rob any legal holes?

 

Philip