Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] For your review - Updated PEDNR WG Charter

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Sure, something like that would be fine.  I would 
prefer to not use this change to expand the 
target period though, and so would suggest 
150-170, 170-200 and 190-220. If we are way out 
of bound, we can always request more time, but 
this will set targets that will keep the pressure 
on. Also, 250 days sets a target which means we 
miss having a prelim final report for Nairobi.
Alan

At 08/06/2009 01:12 PM, Marika Konings wrote:
> Alan, would it be an option to give the WG a 
> timeframe instead of a set date, taking into 
> account that this timetable is open to 
> modification anyway, so that it would read:
>    * WG formed, chair & Council liaison & staff coordinator identified = T
>    * Initial Report: T + 150 - 200 days
>    * First comment period ends: T + 170 - 220 days
>    * Preliminary Final Report: T + 200 - 250 days.
>
> In this way the group has the flexibility to 
> move faster if possible, while at the same time 
> leaving the option open for more time if needed.
> Best regards,
>
> Marika
>
> On 6/8/09 6:24 PM, "Alan Greenberg" 
> <<alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxxx>alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am happy with the text of the charter.  The 
> time line may be problematic. If"T" is the 24th 
> of June (GNSO Council meeting in Sydney), we have
> Initial Report: T + 170 days = 11 Dec 2009
> First comment period ends: T + 190 days = 31 Dec 2009
> Preliminary Final Report: T + 210 days = 20 Jan 2009
>
> That puts the comment period right over the 
> Christmas break. If we slip a few weeks, it puts 
> pulling together the Initial Report over that period. Neither are acceptable.
> I think that we have two options:
>
> 1. Decrease the first two periods to 150 and 
> 170. That puts the deadline for the initial 
> report at 3 weeks after Seoul, presuming we 
> could have worked out an acceptable solution 
> during a face-to-face meeting, and give a longer 
> period for final drafting factoring in Christmas.
> 2. Increase the last two periods to 200 and 220, 
> putting the deadline for comments at 01 Jan 10 
> and the report deadline at 30 Jan 10.
> I can live with either. Option 2 gives us a bit 
> more time, but is still agressive.
> Alan
>
>
> At 08/06/2009 06:15 AM, you wrote:
> Others (especially Alan, Mike O.), please share 
> your views on the PEDNR WG Charter with the 
> mailing list so Tim can submit it to the Council 
> in time for consideration at its meeting in Sydney.
> Thanks,
>
> Marika
>
> On 6/4/09 1:02 PM, "Tim Ruiz" 
> <<tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>tim@xxxxxxxxxxx <<tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>tim@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
>
>
> Marika,
>
> Thanks, it looks good to me. I'll wait to submit the motion to the
> Council until everyone agrees it's good to go (or at least those that
> care to comment). But you might want to remind me :)
>
> Rob has agreed to present the theory/practice piece of the workshop.
> He'll need to know how much time he has and other details necessary. Do
> we put on this mail list? Or will you be coordinating with him? This
> group will also want to see at least a draft of his presentation before
> hand.
>
> Tim
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [gnso-pednr-dt] For your review - Updated PEDNR WG Charter
> From: Marika Konings 
> <<marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx 
> <<marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> >
> Date: Thu, June 04, 2009 3:28 am
> To: 
> "<gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
>  <<gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx> 
> " 
> <<gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
>  <<gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx> >
> Dear All,
>
> Please find attached an updated version of the proposed PEDNR WG
> Charter, following yesterday?s discussion.
>
> This document as well as the revised text have been posted on the PEDNR
> Wiki which is now up and running on
> <https://st.icann.org/post-expiration-dn-recovery-wg/index.cgi?post_expiration_domain_name_recovery_wg>https://st.icann.org/post-expiration-dn-recovery-wg/index.cgi?post_expiration_domain_name_recovery_wg 
> .
>
> Please share your comments and suggestions on the mailing list. A next
> call will be scheduled for Wednesday 10 June at 18.00 UTC.
>
> With best regards,
>
> Marika