Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] Definitions...

["Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

just catching up on threads prior to the call.  looking at Michael's  
tongue-twister acronym, i came up with this (slightly more  
pronounceable) version;
        ReNHPED -- pronounced "ren-ped"

doesn't exactly fire off brass bands, but easier than some of the  
other versions i came up with.  :-)
i do like the drive for precision by both of you.

m


On Aug 11, 2009, at 1:06 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote:

> I will add that if we use some long phrase such as Michael is  
> suggesting, that we use one with a reasonably pronounceable  
> acronym.  I don't put RNHPED in that category.  ;-)
> Alan
>
> At 11/08/2009 12:21 PM, Michael D. Palage wrote:
>
> > Alan,
> >
> > You kind of beat me to the "send" button.
> >
> > May I suggest that instead of using the term "Original" which might  
> > cause
> > confusion between the individuals that originally registered the  
> > name, that
> > we use the term "Registered Name Holder prior to the expiration date"
> > (RNHPED).
> >
> > While I appreciated that this may be a little long winded, the term
> > expiration date is also a term used in the various agreements.
> >
> > From the RAA - "the expiration date of the registration" and  
> > "3.3.1.5 The
> > expiration date of the registration;" and "3.7.5.4. .......'the  
> > domain's
> > expiration date'"
> >
> > I think we are on more solid ground the closer we stay true to  
> > legal terms
> > already incorporated into the existing legal agreements.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Michael
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> > ]
> > On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 10:57 AM
> > To: gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [gnso-pednr-dt] Definitions...
> >
> >
> > I had volunteered to try to define the term we will use for the
> > entity who held a domain name just prior to exiration.
> >
> > In mid-term, the RAA uses the term "Registered Name Holder" and in
> > conversation, we tend to use the term "Registrant" to denote the
> > entity that the Registrar believes has acquired the domain name and
> > the information which is put in the appropriate Whois database.
> >
> > I suggest that the above definition be refined if necessary, and that
> > for the purposes of this PDP, we use the terms "Registered Name
> > Holder" and "Registrant" interchangeably.
> >
> > I further suggest that we prefix either term with the word "Original"
> > to denote the Registrant at the time just prior to expiration. It has
> > been suggested that "original" might be referring to the entity that
> > registered the name in the first place (potentially several years
> > ago), but for the purposes of this discussion who held the name in
> > the very first place is not particularly relevant.
> >
> > There have been some reports that (particularly for web-hosting
> > resellers), a domain name is never put in the name of the entity that
> > requested the name (despite there being no proxy-type agreement), and
> > we may need to come up with terms that address this situation as  
> > well.
> > Alan
- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109
fax             866-280-2356
web     www.haven2.com
handle	OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook,  
Google, etc.)