Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] Definitions...

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Mike, I think that we settled on RAE. I believe that we decided how 
it would be pronounced, but we have already had people use two 
variants - the letters R-A-E and as "ray".
Alan

At 01/09/2009 09:04 AM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
> just catching up on threads prior to the call.  looking at Michael's
> tongue-twister acronym, i came up with this (slightly more
> pronounceable) version;
>
>         ReNHPED -- pronounced "ren-ped"
>
> doesn't exactly fire off brass bands, but easier than some of the
> other versions i came up with.  :-)
>
> i do like the drive for precision by both of you.
>
> m
>
>
> On Aug 11, 2009, at 1:06 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
>
> >
> > I will add that if we use some long phrase such as Michael is
> > suggesting, that we use one with a reasonably pronounceable
> > acronym.  I don't put RNHPED in that category.  ;-)
> >
> > Alan
> >
> > At 11/08/2009 12:21 PM, Michael D. Palage wrote:
> >
> >> Alan,
> >>
> >> You kind of beat me to the "send" button.
> >>
> >> May I suggest that instead of using the term "Original" which might
> >> cause
> >> confusion between the individuals that originally registered the
> >> name, that
> >> we use the term "Registered Name Holder prior to the expiration date"
> >> (RNHPED).
> >>
> >> While I appreciated that this may be a little long winded, the term
> >> expiration date is also a term used in the various agreements.
> >>
> >> From the RAA - "the expiration date of the registration" and
> >> "3.3.1.5 The
> >> expiration date of the registration;" and "3.7.5.4. .......'the
> >> domain's
> >> expiration date'"
> >>
> >> I think we are on more solid ground the closer we stay true to
> >> legal terms
> >> already incorporated into the existing legal agreements.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >> Michael
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> >> ]
> >> On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
> >> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 10:57 AM
> >> To: gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: [gnso-pednr-dt] Definitions...
> >>
> >>
> >> I had volunteered to try to define the term we will use for the
> >> entity who held a domain name just prior to exiration.
> >>
> >> In mid-term, the RAA uses the term "Registered Name Holder" and in
> >> conversation, we tend to use the term "Registrant" to denote the
> >> entity that the Registrar believes has acquired the domain name and
> >> the information which is put in the appropriate Whois database.
> >>
> >> I suggest that the above definition be refined if necessary, and that
> >> for the purposes of this PDP, we use the terms "Registered Name
> >> Holder" and "Registrant" interchangeably.
> >>
> >> I further suggest that we prefix either term with the word "Original"
> >> to denote the Registrant at the time just prior to expiration. It has
> >> been suggested that "original" might be referring to the entity that
> >> registered the name in the first place (potentially several years
> >> ago), but for the purposes of this discussion who held the name in
> >> the very first place is not particularly relevant.
> >>
> >> There have been some reports that (particularly for web-hosting
> >> resellers), a domain name is never put in the name of the entity that
> >> requested the name (despite there being no proxy-type agreement), and
> >> we may need to come up with terms that address this situation as
> >> well.
> >>
> >> Alan
> >
>
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone   651-647-6109
> fax             866-280-2356
> web     www.haven2.com
> handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook,
> Google, etc.)