Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] Interim Report: Final Comments
I find many of these last-minute additions quite inappropriate. In particular I find many of them not at all "objective" but presenting a very specific view. I have no problem with including ALL of the points made during meetings, but they should leave the reader with the understanding that these were statements that were not universally accepted. Please see my specific comments. Alan At 29/05/2010 10:37 PM, James M. Bladel wrote: Alan, Marika and Team: Attached, please find an edited "Clean Version" of the Draft Interim Report, containing the comments of -some- of the Rr participants on the WG. in order to save time (it's a holiday weekend in the US) and to reduce the consolidation burden on Marika, we've worked to produce a set of combined comments. In general, they fall in to one of three categories: 1. Typos, error corrections, and other cosmetic and/or readability changes. 2. Minor modifications of the language to present a more objective point of view. 3. Insertion of points that were raised during the meetings and teleconferences, or on the list, but omitted from earlier drafts. Thanks, and kudos to everyone for their hard work! J. ----------------- James M. Bladel GoDaddy.com Attachment:
PEDNR Initial Report Registrar Comments-ag.doc
|