<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] For Final Review - Updated PEDNR Initial Report
- To: PEDNR <gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] For Final Review - Updated PEDNR Initial Report
- From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 22:03:33 -0400
Siva, My comments on your suggestions:
- Regarding the 1st and 2nd survey. Although we will be looking at
area where the results in the two surveys are different from each
other, the intent was that the 2nd version replace the first.
- On the omission of the comments in the document, we will certainly
be looking at the comments in detail in the WG, but I do not feel
that, taken out of the context of the WG discussions, they will be
either fully understandable or add a lot to the results.
- On the NCSG or At-Large "negotiating" with registrars to alter the
terms of their agreements with registrants, I do not believe that
either group is empowered to do this, and I would not want to put
such a suggestion in writing without the clearance of ICANN legal
Counsel. There are clear rules regarding what ICANN can direct
(basically only those things that are within the limits of "consensus
policy"). The overall terms in registration agreements are not within
that scope (although limited parts are).
Alan
At 30/05/2010 04:47 PM, Sivasubramanian M wrote:
Dear Marika
I have made a few comments, included as notes in the attached documents.
Thank you
Sivasubramanian M
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|