ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-pednr-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] PEDNR: A proposed path forward

  • To: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] PEDNR: A proposed path forward
  • From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:03:29 -0500

hi all,

i like this a lot,  lots to talk about, wrangle over, etc.  but a great first 
step.  hats off to you folks.

here are things i like;

-- consistent behavior immediately after expiry

-- registrants get to go to the front of the line and have that position 
protected for a period of time

-- education (presumably made simpler by virtue of that consistent process 
after expiry)

if i were climbing a mountain, i'd say that this is a good place to drive that 
first piton in.

there are a few things that i'd like to add to the pile (and i'd like to haggle 
over the length of time), but i'll leave that for another day.

thanks,

mikey


On Nov 1, 2010, at 2:12 PM, James M. Bladel wrote:

> 
> Good afternoon, everyone.
> 
> 
> With our review of community feedback complete, several of us on the WG
> have been working to synthesize all the various positions and opinions
> expressed on PEDNR into a compromise proposal.
> 
> 
> The objectives of putting this forward are:
> 
> (1)  Provide additional safeguards for registrants to guard against the
> inadvertent loss of registrations, secured by Consensus Policy.
> (2)  Provide some consistency in the registrant's experience with
> expiring names.
> (3)  Accomplish (1) and (3) in a manner that does not unnecessarily
> disrupt the numerous commercial and non-commercial activities in our
> industry.
> 
> With these in mind, we submit the following slate of proposals for your
> consideration.  
> 
> 
> Grace Period (Secured by Consensus Policy)
> -------------------------------------------
> Guaranteed five-day registrar grace period (what to call it will need to
> be determined so as to avoid confusion with similarly named periods)
> following expiration.  Only the RAE can recover/renew name during this
> period.  While the name will not go to auction during this period, it
> could be explicitly deleted by the Registrar, which commences the RGP.  
> 
> 
> Renewal notices (Secured by Consensus Policy)
> ---------------------------------------------
> Requirement to send (by a method at each registrar's discretion) a
> minimum of one renewal notice to registrant no later than 10 days prior
> to expiry, and a second notice the day prior to the expiry date
> notifying the RAE that the 5-day registrar grace period will begin the
> following day.  
> 
> 
> Whois
> -----
> No changes to Whois recommended.
> 
> 
> Community Education
> -------------------
> Registrars:       
> Best practice recommendation: A registrar will design and host a
> neutral-content site with important information about how to properly
> steward a domain name and prevent unintended loss.  
> Registrar should provide on its web site, and send to registrant in
> separate e-mail to registrant immediately following initial
> registration, a set of instructions for keeping domain name records
> current and for lessening the chance of mistakenly allowing the name to
> expire.  
> 
> ALAC: 
> Budget time/money/resources to public education campaign to encourage
> renewals and prevent unwanted loss of a name.
> 

- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109  
fax             866-280-2356  
web     http://www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy