<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-pednr-dt] Re: A correction
- To: Michael Young <myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, PEDNR <gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-pednr-dt] Re: A correction
- From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 17:49:37 -0500
I think that you heard me correctly, but that doesn't make me right.
Way back when, I checked all of the registry agreements and I believe
the findings were that all unsponsored TLDs except two (perhaps name
and pro?) supported the RGP, but none of the sponsored ones did
(again, according to what I found or did not find).
I would be delighted to have the correct analysis.
Alan
At 04/12/2010 05:36 PM, Michael Young wrote:
Alan in the GNSO meeting I thought I heard you say that sponsored
TLDs do not support RGP, maybe I misunderstood. If I didn't then
you should know .mobi does support RGP and has since launch. Most
members of the RySG do support it currently, with .coop being the
notable exception due to a specialized registry model.
Best Regards,
Michael Young
Vice President, Product Development
Afilias
O:416-673-4109
M:+1-647-289-1220
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|