RE: [gnso-pednr-dt] Exceptions

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

It dawns on me that perhaps we are using the wrong term. How about 
"variants" instead of exceptions?
If we can find a way to build more flexibility into the policy, that 
would be fine but I wonder whether it is actually possible.
Alan

At 05/12/2010 04:29 PM, James M. Bladel wrote:

> My general thoughts about "Policy Exceptions"
>
> If we are creating exceptions to policy, then we are tacitly
> acknowledging that registrars require discretion in this area.  Which
> raises the question of whether Consensus Policy is the appropriate
> hammer for this particular nail.
>
> So, we should look at other remedies (e.g. Best Practices) or build more
> flexibility into the policy language itself.
>
>
> Thanks--
>
> J.
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] Exceptions
> From: "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sun, December 05, 2010 3:10 pm
> To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: PEDNR <gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> Ok. So that pretty much confirms what I suspected
>
>
> Mr. Michele Neylon
> Blacknight
> http://Blacknight.tel
>
> Via iPhone so excuse typos and brevity
>
> On 5 Dec 2010, at 15:49, "Marika Konings" <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On 05/12/10 15:43, "Pam Little" <Pam.Little@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Neither Stacy Burnette nor me have come across any request in the past.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Pam
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> >> [mailto:owner-gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michele Neylon ::
> >> Blacknight
> >> Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 7:40 AM
> >> To: Marika Konings
> >> Cc: PEDNR
> >> Subject: Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] Exceptions
> >>
> >>
> >> Marika
> >>
> >> To your knowledge has any registrar _ever_ used this?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Michele
> >>
> >>
> >> On 5 Dec 2010, at 15:30, Marika Konings wrote:
> >>
> >>> Dear All,
> >>>
> >>> In response to the question on exceptions, it was suggested that the WG
> >>> might want to take a look at the ICANN Procedure For Handling WHOIS
> >>> Conflicts with Privacy Law, at
> >>> http://icann.org/en/processes/icann-procedure-17jan08.htm, that outlines
> >>> a procedure to be used for requesting waiver from full compliance with
> >>> Whois requirements based on privacy laws. While an exceptions procedure
> >>> as envisioned in the PEDNR might not need to be as detailed or complex,
> >>> it might serve as a starting point.
> >>>
> >>> With best regards,
> >>>
> >>> Marika
> >>
> >> Mr Michele Neylon
> >> Blacknight Solutions
> >> Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
> >> ICANN Accredited Registrar
> >> http://www.blacknight.com/
> >> http://blog.blacknight.com/
> >> http://blacknight.mobi/
> >> http://mneylon.tel
> >> Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
> >> US: 213-233-1612
> >> UK: 0844 484 9361
> >> Locall: 1850 929 929
> >> Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
> >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
> >> -------------------------------
> >> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business
> >> Park,Sleaty
> >> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845
> >>
> >>
> >
> >