RE: [gnso-pednr-dt] Exceptions

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Be careful of the use of 'variant'; it has very specific many for IDNs.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-pednr-
> dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
> Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 9:26 AM
> To: James M. Bladel; Michele Neylon :: Blacknight
> Cc: PEDNR; Marika Konings
> Subject: RE: [gnso-pednr-dt] Exceptions
> 
> 
> It dawns on me that perhaps we are using the wrong term. How about
> "variants" instead of exceptions?
> 
> If we can find a way to build more flexibility into the policy, that
> would be fine but I wonder whether it is actually possible.
> 
> Alan
> 
> At 05/12/2010 04:29 PM, James M. Bladel wrote:
> 
> >My general thoughts about "Policy Exceptions"
> >
> >If we are creating exceptions to policy, then we are tacitly
> >acknowledging that registrars require discretion in this area.  Which
> >raises the question of whether Consensus Policy is the appropriate
> >hammer for this particular nail.
> >
> >So, we should look at other remedies (e.g. Best Practices) or build
> more
> >flexibility into the policy language itself.
> >
> >
> >Thanks--
> >
> >J.
> >
> >-------- Original Message --------
> >Subject: Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] Exceptions
> >From: "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Date: Sun, December 05, 2010 3:10 pm
> >To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: PEDNR <gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> >Ok. So that pretty much confirms what I suspected
> >
> >
> >Mr. Michele Neylon
> >Blacknight
> >http://Blacknight.tel
> >
> >Via iPhone so excuse typos and brevity
> >
> >On 5 Dec 2010, at 15:49, "Marika Konings" <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
> >wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 05/12/10 15:43, "Pam Little" <Pam.Little@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Neither Stacy Burnette nor me have come across any request in the
> past.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >>
> > >> Pam
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: owner-gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> > >> [mailto:owner-gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michele
Neylon
> ::
> > >> Blacknight
> > >> Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 7:40 AM
> > >> To: Marika Konings
> > >> Cc: PEDNR
> > >> Subject: Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] Exceptions
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Marika
> > >>
> > >> To your knowledge has any registrar _ever_ used this?
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >>
> > >> Michele
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 5 Dec 2010, at 15:30, Marika Konings wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Dear All,
> > >>>
> > >>> In response to the question on exceptions, it was suggested that
> the WG
> > >>> might want to take a look at the ICANN Procedure For Handling
> WHOIS
> > >>> Conflicts with Privacy Law, at
> > >>> http://icann.org/en/processes/icann-procedure-17jan08.htm, that
> outlines
> > >>> a procedure to be used for requesting waiver from full
compliance
> with
> > >>> Whois requirements based on privacy laws. While an exceptions
> procedure
> > >>> as envisioned in the PEDNR might not need to be as detailed or
> complex,
> > >>> it might serve as a starting point.
> > >>>
> > >>> With best regards,
> > >>>
> > >>> Marika
> > >>
> > >> Mr Michele Neylon
> > >> Blacknight Solutions
> > >> Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
> > >> ICANN Accredited Registrar
> > >> http://www.blacknight.com/
> > >> http://blog.blacknight.com/
> > >> http://blacknight.mobi/
> > >> http://mneylon.tel
> > >> Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
> > >> US: 213-233-1612
> > >> UK: 0844 484 9361
> > >> Locall: 1850 929 929
> > >> Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
> > >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
> > >> -------------------------------
> > >> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business
> > >> Park,Sleaty
> > >> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
>