RE: [gnso-pednr-dt] Exceptions

["Michael Young" <myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I am finding the train of thought going a little sideways to be frank, I
think it makes sense to continue to move systematically through the proposed
recommendation list, coming to concurrence on each item, rather than jump
back and forth on several points of contention.

Can we spend  tomorrow's meeting focusing on identifying where all the
parties are still apart on those recommendations? Then work specifically
through those currently problematic recommendations until we arrive at
something the group can support?

Michael Young

M:+1-647-289-1220

-----Original Message-----
From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: December-06-10 9:46 AM
To: Alan Greenberg; James M. Bladel; Michele Neylon :: Blacknight
Cc: PEDNR; Marika Konings
Subject: RE: [gnso-pednr-dt] Exceptions


Be careful of the use of 'variant'; it has very specific many for IDNs.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-pednr- 
> dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
> Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 9:26 AM
> To: James M. Bladel; Michele Neylon :: Blacknight
> Cc: PEDNR; Marika Konings
> Subject: RE: [gnso-pednr-dt] Exceptions
> 
> 
> It dawns on me that perhaps we are using the wrong term. How about 
> "variants" instead of exceptions?
> 
> If we can find a way to build more flexibility into the policy, that 
> would be fine but I wonder whether it is actually possible.
> 
> Alan
> 
> At 05/12/2010 04:29 PM, James M. Bladel wrote:
> 
> >My general thoughts about "Policy Exceptions"
> >
> >If we are creating exceptions to policy, then we are tacitly 
> >acknowledging that registrars require discretion in this area.  Which 
> >raises the question of whether Consensus Policy is the appropriate 
> >hammer for this particular nail.
> >
> >So, we should look at other remedies (e.g. Best Practices) or build
> more
> >flexibility into the policy language itself.
> >
> >
> >Thanks--
> >
> >J.
> >
> >-------- Original Message --------
> >Subject: Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] Exceptions
> >From: "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Date: Sun, December 05, 2010 3:10 pm
> >To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: PEDNR <gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> >Ok. So that pretty much confirms what I suspected
> >
> >
> >Mr. Michele Neylon
> >Blacknight
> >http://Blacknight.tel
> >
> >Via iPhone so excuse typos and brevity
> >
> >On 5 Dec 2010, at 15:49, "Marika Konings" <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
> >wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 05/12/10 15:43, "Pam Little" <Pam.Little@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Neither Stacy Burnette nor me have come across any request in the
> past.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >>
> > >> Pam
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: owner-gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
> > >> [mailto:owner-gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michele
Neylon
> ::
> > >> Blacknight
> > >> Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 7:40 AM
> > >> To: Marika Konings
> > >> Cc: PEDNR
> > >> Subject: Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] Exceptions
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Marika
> > >>
> > >> To your knowledge has any registrar _ever_ used this?
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >>
> > >> Michele
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 5 Dec 2010, at 15:30, Marika Konings wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Dear All,
> > >>>
> > >>> In response to the question on exceptions, it was suggested that
> the WG
> > >>> might want to take a look at the ICANN Procedure For Handling
> WHOIS
> > >>> Conflicts with Privacy Law, at
> > >>> http://icann.org/en/processes/icann-procedure-17jan08.htm, that
> outlines
> > >>> a procedure to be used for requesting waiver from full
compliance
> with
> > >>> Whois requirements based on privacy laws. While an exceptions
> procedure
> > >>> as envisioned in the PEDNR might not need to be as detailed or
> complex,
> > >>> it might serve as a starting point.
> > >>>
> > >>> With best regards,
> > >>>
> > >>> Marika
> > >>
> > >> Mr Michele Neylon
> > >> Blacknight Solutions
> > >> Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection ICANN Accredited Registrar 
> > >> http://www.blacknight.com/ http://blog.blacknight.com/ 
> > >> http://blacknight.mobi/ http://mneylon.tel Intl. +353 (0) 59 
> > >> 9183072
> > >> US: 213-233-1612
> > >> UK: 0844 484 9361
> > >> Locall: 1850 929 929
> > >> Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
> > >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
> > >> -------------------------------
> > >> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business 
> > >> Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
>