Meeting Cancelled: RE: [gnso-pednr-dt] Where we are now.

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

I'm afraid we have no choice.  Apologies to Cheryl if she is getting up for it.

I am not sure that what we have had on the mailing list in the last 
hours has really been a dialogue, but I do agree that a dialogue on 
the list is what we must have.
Alan

At 18/01/2011 11:53 AM, Diaz, Paul wrote:
> The following have now posted regrets for today's call:
>
> Mikey O'Connor
> James Bladel
> Mason Cole
> Michele Neylon
> Oliver Hope
>
> Given this includes many of the regular PEDNR participants, I do not
> believe we will reach a quorum today.  In any event, we won't have a
> representative sample of registrar reps present - making debate about
> timeframes and mandatory out-of-band signals kind of pointless.
>
> Can we postpone today's discussions until next week (25 January)?
>
> In the interim, we should all continue the dialogue on the mailing list.
>
> Regards, P
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 11:25 AM
> To: PEDNR
> Subject: [gnso-pednr-dt] Where we are now.
>
>
> I would like to summarize where we are at the moment.
>
> Assuming that agreements already made are not revoked, we have made
> substantial progress. This has happened with (as I see it) ground
> given up by all parties and we need to acknowledge that. Regardless
> of the stumbling blocks still in our path, this is a good outcome.
>
> We are working on one issue - the time allowed for guaranteed renewal
> and how the domain behaves during that period. I thought that I had
> made a useful proposal - simply stated and very flexible.  But
> apparently it is not viewed that way by registrars. I would
> appreciate having alternatives proposed that address what is
> perceived as a real need by the user community - as Mikey has put it,
> an out-of-band signal of expiration.
>
> As hard as it may be to believe, I too want policies that are both
> enforceable and practical. And effective.
>
> Alan