RE: [gnso-pednr-dt] Comments on draft final report.

["Mason Cole" <masonc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

OK, thanks Marika.

-----Original Message-----
From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 10:05 AM
To: Mason Cole; Alan Greenberg; PEDNR
Subject: Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] Comments on draft final report.

Mason, you should find them back in the integrated version I just sent
around. Alan made his comments before Oliver submitted his. He did send
out another version in which he commented on some of Oliver's comments.
The integrated version should have captured all the comments received to
date.

Marika

On 25/01/11 19:00, "Mason Cole" <masonc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>Alan, is there a reason the edits and concerns submitted by Oliver were
>omitted?
>
>If moving section 3 to the annex is to be done, I for one will have
>additional edits to section 7 to make the concerns outlined in the
>current section 3 known.  I object to removing them from the report or
>burying them in an annex.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alan Greenberg [mailto:alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 7:47 AM
>To: PEDNR
>Subject: Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] Comments on draft final report.
>
>My apologies. When I sent this, I attached the wrong version of the
>draft final report - one that Marika had sent me earlier with
>suggestions for some draft recommendations, a version that was never
>distributed.
>
>The correct one is belatedly attached here.
>
>Alan
>