RE: [gnso-pednr-dt] Comments on draft final report.

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Mason, that version was just my edits (that is, I took the original 
document and made my comments). I also commented on Oliver's comments 
but that was in a separate document. I believe that Marika has 
attempted to merge both in her most recent draft just sent, but I 
haven't looked at it yet.
If I remember correctly (no time to look up now), these concerns were 
to some extent commenting on various statements in the request for 
issues report and elsewhere and focused on things like the last of 
backup documentation for various statements. Since they were made in 
a section of the report (now moved I think) that was largely lifted 
from the Issues Report, I felt that they should not be made there. 
These are to some extent reflected in the deliberations section 
(Section 7??) but if Marika has not sufficiently reflected your 
comments, please do submit changes.
Alan

At 25/01/2011 01:00 PM, Mason Cole wrote:
> Alan, is there a reason the edits and concerns submitted by Oliver were
> omitted?
>
> If moving section 3 to the annex is to be done, I for one will have
> additional edits to section 7 to make the concerns outlined in the
> current section 3 known.  I object to removing them from the report or
> burying them in an annex.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan Greenberg [mailto:alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 7:47 AM
> To: PEDNR
> Subject: Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] Comments on draft final report.
>
> My apologies. When I sent this, I attached the wrong version of the
> draft final report - one that Marika had sent me earlier with
> suggestions for some draft recommendations, a version that was never
> distributed.
>
> The correct one is belatedly attached here.
>
> Alan