Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] GNSO Approval on PEDNR recommendation
- To: "PEDNR (gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx)" <gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] GNSO Approval on PEDNR recommendation
- From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:26:05 -0500
yup yup yup. nice closure. i think we Working Group types may want to add
that "all or nothing" kind of language to future reports -- maybe "all, nothing
btw, i think there's another round of public comment before the Board approves
it. so the timeline is not what you'd want to call "speedy." :-)
On Jul 21, 2011, at 9:15 AM, James M. Bladel wrote:
> Agreed! And with so many new topics are on the horizon, it's good to
> have this one behind us.
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: [gnso-pednr-dt] GNSO Approval on PEDNR recommendation
> From: "Michael Young" <michael@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, July 21, 2011 8:25 am
> To: "'Alan Greenberg'" <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>, "'PEDNR'"
> Fantastic, nice ending to a great deal of work.
> Best Regards,
> Michael Young
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
> Sent: July-21-11 9:05 AM
> To: PEDNR
> Subject: [gnso-pednr-dt] GNSO Approval on PEDNR recommendation
> I am pleased to report that at its meeting today, the GNSO unanimously
> approved the PEDNR PDP Recommendations.
- - - - - - - - -
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)