ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-pednr-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] GNSO Approval on PEDNR recommendation

  • To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, James Bladel <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Michael Young <michael@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] GNSO Approval on PEDNR recommendation
  • From: Jeff Eckhaus <eckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 09:44:35 -0700

As always, great answer

Thanks



On 7/21/11 9:28 AM, "Marika Konings" <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>For your information, now that the GNSO Council has approved the
>recommendations, they will need to be put out for public comment as
>required by the ICANN Bylaws (Article III, Section 6: ŒProvide public
>notice on the Website explaining what policies are being considered for
>adoption and why, at least twenty-one days (and if practical earlier)
>prior to any action by the board¹ and Œprovide a reasonable opportunity
>for parties to comment on the adoption of the proposed policies, to see
>the comments of others, and to reply to those comments, prior to any
>action by the Board¹). In addition, the GAC needs to be notified (Article
>III, Section 6: ŒIn those cases where the policy action affects public
>policy concerns, to request the opinion of the Governmental Advisory
>Committee¹). As the Board meeting in September is designated as a retreat,
>the first opportunity the Board will likely have to consider the
>recommendations, taking into account the steps that need to be taken
>first, is the Board meeting in October at the ICANN meeting in Dakar.
>
>With best regards,
>
>Marika
>
>On 21/07/11 18:18, "Jeff Eckhaus" <eckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>>Is there a timeline for when we expect Board approval and implementation?
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>On 7/21/11 7:15 AM, "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Agreed!  And with so many new topics are on the horizon, it's good to
>>>have this one behind us.
>>>
>>>J.
>>>
>>>-------- Original Message --------
>>>Subject: RE: [gnso-pednr-dt] GNSO Approval on PEDNR recommendation
>>>From: "Michael Young" <michael@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>Date: Thu, July 21, 2011 8:25 am
>>>To: "'Alan Greenberg'" <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>, "'PEDNR'"
>>><gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>>
>>>Fantastic, nice ending to a great deal of work.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Best Regards,
>>>
>>>Michael Young
>>>M:+1-647-289-1220
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: owner-gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>>>[mailto:owner-gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
>>>On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
>>>Sent: July-21-11 9:05 AM
>>>To: PEDNR
>>>Subject: [gnso-pednr-dt] GNSO Approval on PEDNR recommendation
>>>
>>>
>>>I am pleased to report that at its meeting today, the GNSO unanimously
>>>approved the PEDNR PDP Recommendations.
>>>
>>>Alan
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>Please NOTE: This electronic message, including any attachments, may
>>include privileged, confidential and/or inside information owned by
>>Demand Media, Inc. Any distribution or use of this communication by
>>anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and
>>may be unlawful.  If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
>>the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from your
>>system. Thank you.
>>
>


Please NOTE: This electronic message, including any attachments, may include 
privileged, confidential and/or inside information owned by Demand Media, Inc. 
Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended 
recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you are not the 
intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and 
then delete it from your system. Thank you.




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>